Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)152. Discarded feminine hygiene products do not constitute a biohazard according to OSHA.
In the same way that tissue used to absorb blood from a bloody nose is not a biohazard.
They do not have to be specifically regulated waste according to the Bloodborne Pathogens Standards.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
286 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There is a difference between disliking a work and thinking it "silly."
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#109
I happen to think that the elementary school responses in this thread...
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#116
I don't just "accept" anything because it's called art, if that's what you're implying.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#170
Interesting. I just ran across this response so we might be out of sequence . . .
MrModerate
Dec 2013
#187
In the interview the artist specifically addresses her intent to confront on a sexual level.
MrModerate
Dec 2013
#199
She's asking for people to think and be provocative. Not be sexist pigs.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#209
Rude and stupid responses should be expected. But not on a message board like DU.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#211
An opinion is worthless if it is not backed up with considerable explanation.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#124
I'm not demanding an explanation. I'm saying that without an explanation...
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#131
Have you been able to find anyone who gives a shit about your disapproval?
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#274
"so what if she shoves a skein of yarn up her vagina" - Ummm, that's kind of the entire point.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#128
So it's a minor annoyance that trash was not disposed of properly. How does that make it gross?
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#147
Discarded feminine hygiene products do not constitute a biohazard according to OSHA.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#152
Ah, so art can only answer deeper questions than what constitutes grossness.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#169
My guess is it's the same thing that makes ear wax gross, boogers, and toe jam gross. /nt
Marr
Dec 2013
#177
You haven't actually answered the question. You've just shifted to other things.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#178
This is the sort of silly excrement-doodling the art world has become thoughtlessly attached to.
Marr
Dec 2013
#189
Glad I wasn't drinking my coffee when I ran across "political and social activism" . . .
MrModerate
Dec 2013
#139
Which implies that the artist must handle positive and negative feedback no matter how ridiculous.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#146
Disappointed to learn that her vagina is not actually doing the knitting.
TwilightGardener
Dec 2013
#5
that's what I thought-- it would be like chopsticks and then she'd be doing latch-hook with her ass
yurbud
Dec 2013
#123
Lots of clickety-clickety noises and then...a nice scarf emerges, perfect for
TwilightGardener
Dec 2013
#145
Ah, thank you. I was thinking it'd be neat if a DUer did this. thanks, am tired and confused tonight
uppityperson
Dec 2013
#16
"bODY_rEMIx/gOLDBERG_vARIATIONS" by Marie Chouinard, premiered in 2005 for the Venice Biennale's Int
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2013
#33
No, it's meant to materialize menstruation in such a way that is not inherently abject.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#43
No, I like the verb materialize in this context. It fits well into the rhetoric...
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#143
I don't think you need to have a learning difference to find that performance pointless. nt
MADem
Dec 2013
#52
This is not art. This is no different from Lady Gaga's meat dress, like...
Sarah Ibarruri
Dec 2013
#94
I imagine that most middle-schoolers know that knitting with one's vagina is impossible.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#157
Are you kidding me? Are you really suggesting that her art is simply a result of not having sex?
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#179
Unless you can justify such a disclosure, you're not getting an answer.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#193
Ah so now you've basically just resorted to calling me a dirty hippie.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#205
No, you're embarrassing to this website because of your disgusting, woman hating rhetoric.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#216
Oh so you were merely implying that she needed to go fuck herself. That's much better.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#223
Well, it's not. The poster implied that something else needed to be inserted to her vagina.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#231
She was talking about physical arousal. Which is the result of physical stimulation.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#237
On the contrary, I've been begging people all afternoon to explain themselves.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#240
There's a difference between not enjoying the art and calling an artist physically ugly.
Gravitycollapse
Dec 2013
#244
If you are making vagina art when you are menstruating would that art be called a ....
Botany
Dec 2013
#198
Archiving...I'm the 'vaginal knitting' perfomance artist – and I want to defend my work
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2013
#286