Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
3. I'm not asking for one-to-one
Thu Dec 19, 2013, 01:06 PM
Dec 2013

But the proverbial "apples and oranges" would be closer than this comparison. There is really nothing at all that connects these two historical cases. If the question in the Dreyfus case had been whether Dreyfus had been justified in stealing the state secrets, maybe there would be some sort of analogy to be drawn. But that was not the case at all. The controversy was entirely about a "wrong man" situation, and the anti-Semitism that led to it. It was not about the actual secrets that were revealed to the Germans.

As another thread today discusses, it's possible to be opposed both to the kind of large-scale mass theft of documents that Snowden undertook (which is not in question; only his motivation) and, at the same time, to be against the large-scale unfettered collection of data the NSA employs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Edward Snowden and the Dr...»Reply #3