Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "NONE of this would have happened without the revelations by Edward J. Snowden" [View all]Th1onein
(8,514 posts)68. You bet they are collecting content and storing it.
Your searches, your texts, your emails, your phone calls.
What galls me is that they redefined the word "collecting" to mean accessing what they've already collected. This means that they are collecting and storing all of our data, whatever the source, and can access it at their leisure. They've got dossiers on me, you, everyone, and if we step out of line, they'll use any little thing they have, to prosecute us and ruin our lives.
I'm afraid we have lost our republic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"NONE of this would have happened without the revelations by Edward J. Snowden" [View all]
kpete
Dec 2013
OP
"Anyone who really understands what metadata is knows that it is anonymous by its very nature"
Ratty
Dec 2013
#11
I'm not sure whos teaching you about metadata, but you might want a refund...
TampaAnimusVortex
Dec 2013
#128
When you have less than no idea what you're saying, maybe you shouldn't say it.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#23
What is funny here is that immediately after Snowden exposed the NSA, some here
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#103
All not true. There were things constantly being done about it and it was in the news.
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#60
So you can rationalize away Clapper lying to Congress? I bet you wouldnt let Snowden get away
rhett o rick
Dec 2013
#104
Anyone with an open mind sees the collaboration of a Government agency with private communication
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#6
Huh, this summer we were debating garage boxes and who is a libertarian rat copulator.
Pholus
Dec 2013
#15
Are you trying to say you haven't been shilling for the NSA for 6 months now?
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#25
My 'position' is never set in concrete. If I have 'shifted' to any degree, it's because...
randome
Dec 2013
#33
Well don't listen to Congress for the truth as per your own post, they don't care if it's a lie
Uncle Joe
Dec 2013
#118
Ah, now I see why you hold the views you do. You don't know what Snowden exposed:
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#22
Well you have to respect the Constitution in order to understand that he has exposed crimes.
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#65
FYI: Those discussions were already happening in the exec branch and congress. We didnt need Snowden
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#9
Maybe he didn't speed it up -and maybe, as you say, he slowed it down- but he did shine a big...
randome
Dec 2013
#13
Here is a good timeline by EFF. There has been steady stuff going on for years
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#16
LOL, 67 incidents reported in your link in the second half of 2013 vs 7, 8, 11 incidents
riderinthestorm
Dec 2013
#49
That is actually not correct. It contains more now because it was created in the June-Dec timeline
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#52
They must have been very 'secret' since a majority of the people did not know eg, how the NSA has
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#28
I saw your #16 which doesn't answer my question. What did YOU know that the rest of us who
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#47
Snowden dramatically changed the exposure of the NSA as demonstrated by the EFF link
riderinthestorm
Dec 2013
#50
No, as I noted above, that's not correct. It contains more recent citations because it was created
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#53
Wow, usually I think you tend to be right, but if you actually believe Snowden had no impact....
Logical
Dec 2013
#64
Anyone who was paying attention knew there was a debate going on. See my #16
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#59
Of course the government has the capacity to do almost anything. That's not going to change.
randome
Dec 2013
#85
They lost whatever trust they may have had when Clapper out right lied to Congress and the American
Dustlawyer
Dec 2013
#3
According to Whistle Blower, Binney, you are correct, they are collecting every email, phone call
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#32
I believe we now know some of what they are doing with it. And it is pretty shocking frankly.
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#61
You don't have to worry unless you are out there protesting against the drone warfare or the
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#116
One? How about thousands? How about being brutally beaten and pepper sprayed by Robo Cops
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#129
Somebody gave them names and addresses to raid. I wonder where they got those names and addresses
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#146
Snowden may in fact have bought us enough time to reverse or at least attenuate
boomersense
Dec 2013
#19
Tell that to Ron Wyden who warned us as much as he could that we knew very little about what they
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#37
So Ron Wyden was lying when he told us we would be angry IF we knew what they were up to, and
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#44
Well, you still haven't answered my question. So here's another, why did Clapper lie to Ron Wyden
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#62
Instead of posting duplicate posts, why don't you provide a link to the EFF timeline?
Th1onein
Dec 2013
#71
Let me know when you can answer my very simple questions. Why did Clapper lie if we all knew
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#69
" continuous litigation, hearings and other things going on regarding FISA and the NSA for years"...
boomersense
Dec 2013
#54
It is funny how naive you are to not understand the outrage Snowden caused.....
Logical
Dec 2013
#72
He can't possibly know how bad his argument looks with the EFF link he's posted
riderinthestorm
Dec 2013
#74
Yep. His shining the light on the dark doings of the spies has sent ripples around the world.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2013
#31
That's laughable. Do you understand that the NSA is NOT supposed to spy on Americans?
Th1onein
Dec 2013
#78
You are missing the point: the NSA is not supposed to be collecting info on AMERICANS.
Th1onein
Dec 2013
#82
Nah, not going to bother. You are the one making a point; it's up to you to explain.
Th1onein
Dec 2013
#102
And all of the FISA judges are appointed by right winger John Roberts. Do you have
neverforget
Dec 2013
#113
Meanwhile Chelsea Manning has become a largely forgotten persona non grata...
Blue_Tires
Dec 2013
#67
A situation that our "transparent" government would like to put Snowden in.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2013
#88
indeed - history will absolve him - if freedom and democracy survives
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2013
#121
My opinion, ANYONE supporting any data collection on US citizens without warrant
PowerToThePeople
Dec 2013
#143