Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

renate

(13,776 posts)
40. they're not difficult to find
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 07:16 PM
Dec 2013

Just go to http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed and type "zinc neonates" in the search bar. You will find 1588 studies from peer-reviewed, respected scientific journals. Not all of the studies conclude that zinc supplementation helps undernourished or low-birth-weight babies, but some do; for example:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24025633
Zinc plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of many diseases and in body growth. Preterm neonates have high zinc requirements.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy of zinc supplementation in reducing morbidity and mortality in preterm neonates and to promote growth.
DESIGN:
This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study of very-low-birth-weight preterm neonates randomly allocated on the seventh day of life to receive (zinc group) or not receive (control group) oral zinc supplementation. Total prescribed zinc intake ranged from 9.7 to 10.7 mg/d in the zinc group and from 1.3 to 1.4 mg/d in the placebo control group. The main endpoint was the rate of neonates with ≥1 of the following morbidities: late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leucomalacia, and retinopathy of prematurity. Secondary outcomes were mortality and body growth.
RESULTS:
We enrolled 97 neonates in the zinc group and 96 in the control group. Morbidities were significantly lower in the zinc group (26.8% compared with 41.7%; P = 0.030). The occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis was significantly higher in the control group (6.3% compared with 0%; P = 0.014). Mortality risk was higher in the placebo control group (RR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.08, 5.18; P = 0.006). Daily weight gain was similar in the zinc (18.2 ± 5.6 g · kg(-1) · d(-1)) and control (17.0 ± 8.7 g · kg(-1) · d(-1)) groups (P = 0.478).
CONCLUSION:
Oral zinc supplementation given at high doses reduces morbidities and mortality in preterm neonates.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23746772
Maternal and child malnutrition in low-income and middle-income countries encompasses both undernutrition and a growing problem with overweight and obesity. Low body-mass index, indicative of maternal undernutrition, has declined somewhat in the past two decades but continues to be prevalent in Asia and Africa. Prevalence of maternal overweight has had a steady increase since 1980 and exceeds that of underweight in all regions. Prevalence of stunting of linear growth of children younger than 5 years has decreased during the past two decades, but is higher in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa than elsewhere and globally affected at least 165 million children in 2011; wasting affected at least 52 million children. Deficiencies of vitamin A and zinc result in deaths; deficiencies of iodine and iron, together with stunting, can contribute to children not reaching their developmental potential. Maternal undernutrition contributes to fetal growth restriction, which increases the risk of neonatal deaths and, for survivors, of stunting by 2 years of age. Suboptimum breastfeeding results in an increased risk for mortality in the first 2 years of life. We estimate that undernutrition in the aggregate--including fetal growth restriction, stunting, wasting, and deficiencies of vitamin A and zinc along with suboptimum breastfeeding--is a cause of 3·1 million child deaths annually or 45% of all child deaths in 2011. Maternal overweight and obesity result in increased maternal morbidity and infant mortality. Childhood overweight is becoming an increasingly important contributor to adult obesity, diabetes, and non-communicable diseases. The high present and future disease burden caused by malnutrition in women of reproductive age, pregnancy, and children in the first 2 years of life should lead to interventions focused on these groups.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k&r nt bananas Dec 2013 #1
Excellent rant! livetohike Dec 2013 #2
I could write volumes on the effect of nutrition on the health Holly_Hobby Dec 2013 #3
you sound like an awesome mom! Chrom Dec 2013 #4
Wow. I think you're really onto something here. pnwmom Dec 2013 #5
That's silly, for example, if vets were to use cats as an example, humans would be eating a diet... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #9
Vets, more than many doctors, stress the importance of nutrition. pnwmom Dec 2013 #10
Every time I go to a doctor, they always emphasize the importance of a balanced diet. Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #12
Me too. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #21
Nothing you said changes the fact that many multivitamins and other supplements... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #6
Preemies don't eat a balanced diet. They consume breast milk or formula pnwmom Dec 2013 #11
Well some, others have to be administered in other ways, such as Vitamin K... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #13
What did she say that is anti-science? pnwmom Dec 2013 #14
First off, she mentions "woo" as if what was the subject of her rant somehow goes against... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #15
If you had read her initial post you wouldn't be so confused. n/t pnwmom Dec 2013 #16
OK so she's even more anti-science than I thought, not to mention not able to understand... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #20
Yes, because begging for a rigorous controlled study IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #26
The issue the Annuals of Internal Medicine was talking about was for healthy adults... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #29
You're making a generalization that is false. pnwmom Dec 2013 #34
Yet. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #42
What are you talking about? Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #47
I apologize if my analogy was not clear. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #64
Who mentioned right or wrong here? Those are loaded words, we are talking about... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #46
And I suppose those who fund these peer-reviewed studies fund a lot of them on the Th1onein Dec 2013 #62
the discussion of trace minerals and human physiology is henceforth elehhhhna Dec 2013 #28
No, we are talking about someone misconstruing a report from a science journal... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #31
and Alexander Fleming was just fukking around with mold. elehhhhna Dec 2013 #36
SMOOCH! IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #58
got your back Ida elehhhhna Dec 2013 #86
She's reacting to all the DUers who call any discussions about pnwmom Dec 2013 #37
And the pro big-alternative medicine ideology is just as big if not an even bigger problem.... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #45
There is an OP on DU right now with someone linking to a surgeon pnwmom Dec 2013 #48
I stand corrected on this, I looked it up and you are right... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #49
I agree. I think this was an oversight on his part, not a conspiracy. pnwmom Dec 2013 #50
I know in much of biology, the female is generally referred to as the default state... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #51
Interesting. It doesn't seem to persist, however, into medical school! n/t pnwmom Dec 2013 #52
"technically those women who are chaste...don't need to take..." El_Johns Dec 2013 #76
+10000000000 Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #22
A very thought provoking post. CrispyQ Dec 2013 #7
K&R Excellent point, and well said. n/t Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #8
Ida, if you can find it, a link to your other post might be helpful. nt pnwmom Dec 2013 #17
Here it is --- IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #19
I don't accept anything that the medical journals don't accept. nt politichew Dec 2013 #18
What an eloquent rant... malthaussen Dec 2013 #23
Why, thank you! IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #32
I've never been overly-impressed by possessors of the Sacred Disease... uh, Degree... malthaussen Dec 2013 #35
So do you have any medical studies on zinc from scientific journals? Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #24
You do not consider the Mayo Clinic a valid source? IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #30
Post removed Post removed Dec 2013 #38
You actually dismissed the MAYO CLINIC IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #41
I can't even take you seriously. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #43
Advanced technology looks like magic to the uneducated. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #54
Your arrogance is coming through loud and clear. GeorgeGist Dec 2013 #60
Truth. I'm an uppity woman, filled with the arrogance of the educated. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #66
And by the way, your reply is kind of proving my point. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #84
they're not difficult to find renate Dec 2013 #40
K&R.... daleanime Dec 2013 #25
EPICness of the awesomeness. sibelian Dec 2013 #27
Thank you! Even "information" from WOMEN? IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #33
You'd sort of think it would be ESPECIALLY from women, wouldn't you? sibelian Dec 2013 #78
Bless Queen Victoria - prior to her they were INSISTING IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #80
K & R BuddhaGirl Dec 2013 #39
I find it deliciously ironic that the people against woo are now pushing FUD in GD. Rex Dec 2013 #44
What is FUD? IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #72
FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt. Rex Dec 2013 #74
The funny thing about your piglet and infant analogy justiceischeap Dec 2013 #53
Don't tell anyone but I picked that species for this example on purpose. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #55
That's a righteous rant, doctors assume your brains came out Warpy Dec 2013 #56
How we talk definitely impacts how credible we are deemed. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #71
That's why I would have followed my pediatrician almost anywhere. pnwmom Dec 2013 #75
Kick. You keep ranting, Ida! Squinch Dec 2013 #57
Thank you, Squinch! IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #73
Fantastic! thucythucy Dec 2013 #59
(blush) IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #67
Ida, sorry to tell you this, but there's a MAJOR reason they don't take nutrition seriously. Th1onein Dec 2013 #61
I believe that there is still the war between the "educated" IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #70
I agree so much with this post laundry_queen Dec 2013 #77
Vitamin D for me is an "only in the morning" thing IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #79
I disagree with you, Ida. Th1onein Dec 2013 #81
I'm glad. The whole thing is really infuriating. IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #85
My mother had to find a female doctor, before she was diagnosed. Rex Dec 2013 #63
Good point. 840high Dec 2013 #65
Thank you! IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #68
Very welcome! Rex Dec 2013 #69
I had a friend who was diagnosed with Stage 4 colon cancer.... Th1onein Dec 2013 #82
Same here, people put their faith in their doctor's diagnosis. Rex Dec 2013 #83
what is "woo"? Iris Dec 2013 #87
As used here on DU it can charitably be described -- IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #88
yes. and, oh dear. is this still DU? Iris Dec 2013 #89
To be fair, there are probably less than twenty or so anti-woo IdaBriggs Dec 2013 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More Thoughts on Woo - an...»Reply #40