Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Utah Is on Track to End Homelessness by 2015 With This One Simple Idea [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)82. FDR agreed.
We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. Necessitous men are not free men. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be [font size=3]established for allregardless of station, race, or creed.[/font]
Among these are:
*The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
*The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
*The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
*The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
*The right of every family to a decent home;
*The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
*The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
*The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.
FDR, SOTU, 1944
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be [font size=3]established for allregardless of station, race, or creed.[/font]
Among these are:
*The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
*The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
*The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
*The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
*The right of every family to a decent home;
*The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
*The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
*The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.
FDR, SOTU, 1944
Please note that FDR specified the above as Fundamental Human RIGHTS,
and NOT a Commodities to be SOLD to Americans by For Profit Corporations.
There was a time when voting FOR The Democrat
was voting FOR the above Traditional Democratic party Values.
Sadly, this is no longer true.
--bvar22
a mainstream-Center FDR/LBJ Working Class Democrat
now labeled a "Fringe Leftist" in the New Democrat Centrist Party.
I haven't changed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
U forgot the sarcasm smiley.. By definition if someone has a home then they are not homeless.
geckosfeet
Dec 2013
#5
Republican State Gives Free Houses to Moochers, Cuts Homelessness by 74 Percent
ProSense
Dec 2013
#7
I'm not sure how far it will go, but it won't come to WI with this legislature.
HereSince1628
Dec 2013
#11
The only way this will sink in with economic conservatives is with the value of the dollar
Harmony Blue
Dec 2013
#12
I remember that.. conservative radio called the housing wino hotels, or something. It is logical and
freshwest
Dec 2013
#47
If Obama was all over this and trying to promote it, we know what the result would be.
madinmaryland
Dec 2013
#43
"Do you think the Right Wing could get any MORE crazy?" Yes and Fuck Yes.
madinmaryland
Dec 2013
#93
I have always found Utah to be a strange state. It has some of the most developed
bluestate10
Dec 2013
#22
These apartments will be privately owned, rents collected for profit, not some
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2013
#62
Used to work in the administration of a city homeless shelter. Utah has the right approach.
JDPriestly
Dec 2013
#31
It always seemed to me that, in "Red States", they jump to the opportunity
King_Klonopin
Dec 2013
#56
Food, Shelter and Clothing should be provided to anyone who can't get that for themselves.
harun
Dec 2013
#72
UTAH???? a holiday miracle, indeed. I have been advocating for the same thing in my oh-so-red
niyad
Dec 2013
#75