Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When You Defend Phil Robertson, Here's What You're Really Defending [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)44. The Republican conservative mindset that he represents is the very reason polluting,
melting the icecaps, and destroying the habitat is still occurring on a mass scale.
From a republican conservative website that is supporting and defending Phil Robertson:
Radical Environmentalists Should Mind Their Own Business
The Mind the Store campaign, the latest initiative of a radical environmental organization, pressures the nations top ten largest retailers to remove products from store shelves that contain, in any amount, a list of one hundred chemicals the organization deems hazardous. Following the alarmism playbook, the organization claims these chemicals are linked to a variety of frightening health problems like hormone disruption, cancer, and birth defects despite the overwhelming body of scientific evidence to the contrary.
Alarmism about chemicals is nothing new. Environmental groups have long disseminated their exaggerated claims through the media to consumers in the hopes that Americans would be scared into altering their purchasing habits and would start demanding chemical-free products.
This strategy had some success. Bisphenol-A, a chemical used to make plastics more durable and to prevent bacterial contamination in canned food, is no longer used in certain products. Why? Not because BPA is unsafeit has been used in products for over 60 years and has been declared safe by every major international health agencybut because faced with myriad looming state and local bans and restrictions on the chemical, manufacturers actually asked the FDA to ban its use in certain baby products. From the manufacturers standpoint, its far easier to face one outright ban of even this useful, perfectly safe and reliable chemical, than to try to comply with thousands of regulations.
http://townhall.com/columnists/juliegunlock/2013/06/15/radical-environmentalists-should-mind-their-own-business-n1620349/page/full
The Mind the Store campaign, the latest initiative of a radical environmental organization, pressures the nations top ten largest retailers to remove products from store shelves that contain, in any amount, a list of one hundred chemicals the organization deems hazardous. Following the alarmism playbook, the organization claims these chemicals are linked to a variety of frightening health problems like hormone disruption, cancer, and birth defects despite the overwhelming body of scientific evidence to the contrary.
Alarmism about chemicals is nothing new. Environmental groups have long disseminated their exaggerated claims through the media to consumers in the hopes that Americans would be scared into altering their purchasing habits and would start demanding chemical-free products.
This strategy had some success. Bisphenol-A, a chemical used to make plastics more durable and to prevent bacterial contamination in canned food, is no longer used in certain products. Why? Not because BPA is unsafeit has been used in products for over 60 years and has been declared safe by every major international health agencybut because faced with myriad looming state and local bans and restrictions on the chemical, manufacturers actually asked the FDA to ban its use in certain baby products. From the manufacturers standpoint, its far easier to face one outright ban of even this useful, perfectly safe and reliable chemical, than to try to comply with thousands of regulations.
http://townhall.com/columnists/juliegunlock/2013/06/15/radical-environmentalists-should-mind-their-own-business-n1620349/page/full
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If it is calculated, he is indisputably an extremely evil person by all standards of our society.
Zorra
Dec 2013
#19
That second paragraph is exactly what the conservative religious right is saying now!
mountain grammy
Dec 2013
#17
That photo is cut. if you find the whole picture you would see that he had both hands up and
hrmjustin
Dec 2013
#46
I don't argue that. my issue was with the pic. He was not giving the salute there.
hrmjustin
Dec 2013
#52
No I am not arguing against his being a nazi. That picture was at his ordination to the priesthood w
hrmjustin
Dec 2013
#55
Seems to me it might be time to put the award-winning TV series "Roots" back on the air.
calimary
Dec 2013
#39
Yeah, but Phil & Right Wing would say network just shilling for Obama's Third Term. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2013
#57
And it says nothing about the horrendous murder rate HERE IN Nice, White, Christian America.
calimary
Dec 2013
#40
That does not surprise me. History alone is skewed to their view. Science is still teaching
jwirr
Dec 2013
#86
"While the Dixie Chicks are not entitled to the First Amendment, rednecks are."
SunSeeker
Dec 2013
#74
"A good woman is "hard to find...You gotta marry these girls when they're 15 or 16..."
Zorra
Dec 2013
#33
The Republican conservative mindset that he represents is the very reason polluting,
Zorra
Dec 2013
#44
The more they open their hateful Republican mouths, the more they shoot themselves in the foot,
Zorra
Dec 2013
#54
The New Testament can do just as well. Lets do Phil the Duck Guy, NT style....
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2013
#90