General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whoa! Cracker Barrel ditches Duck Dynasty [View all]Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)At Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:36 AM you sent an alert on the following post:
Cracker Barrel REVERSES decision on DUCK.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4213806
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS:
Another link to a RW site by this poster.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sun Dec 22, 2013, 11:46 AM, and voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: "Reverses", "Backtracks", "Changes", "Sells out", "Surrenders"...... I get the objection to the RW site but the post itself is worth hiding...or paying any attention to.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: In order to defeat the enemy you must understand the enemy. You must study the enemy not matter how distasteful it might be.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I suppose it doesn't hurt to know what the RWers are spouting, no matter how disgusting. For a poster who repeatedly feels the need to link to the site, we always have the option to ignore, now that we know what's going on.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I followed the link. It is to a press release from Cracker Barrel. Leave it.
Apparently it's okay to link to RW sites.