General Discussion

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)

35. No, its not all population based. That's an overly simplistic answer

Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:31 PM

Dec 2013

If we were all living like those in Uruguay and still had these problems, then sure, that would make sense. But we aren't all living equally. Small segments of the population are emitting far more than the overall average emitted by the general population. Sure, 8 billion people alone most certainly doesn't help, but it can no more be implicated than the beef in your fridge, the cellphone in your pocket, the two cars in your garage, etc. Our problem requires a much bigger solution than having Africans stop having babies, as a first world baby is responsible for far more emissions than many 3rd world babies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Five Foods That Are Killing the Planet [View all] Flaxbee Dec 2013 OP

I'm ok hollysmom Dec 2013 #1

Why am I thinking this is just a tad bit overstated? MineralMan Dec 2013 #2

Many of these foods are grown by cutting down vast amounts of trees ... Flaxbee Dec 2013 #3

Overstatement is self-defeating, since anyone MineralMan Dec 2013 #7

You do realise Lordquinton Dec 2013 #13

Yes, I do know that. Once burned, a forest will not burn again, if MineralMan Dec 2013 #14

We are putting the health of the oceans at risk... Blanks Dec 2013 #17

Killing the planet and bad for humans are two MineralMan Dec 2013 #26

lame U4ikLefty Dec 2013 #27

Thank you for your well reasoned discussion. MineralMan Dec 2013 #28

I'm not sure what your point is... Blanks Dec 2013 #29

'It's an animal instinct to protect your progeny' MineralMan Dec 2013 #33

Over 30% of GHG emissions are from land use sector NoOneMan Dec 2013 #31

Again, population. MineralMan Dec 2013 #32

No, its not all population based. That's an overly simplistic answer NoOneMan Dec 2013 #35

Your map is about economics, not population. MineralMan Dec 2013 #36

Yep, which is exactly why its not ONLY about population NoOneMan Dec 2013 #37

Shade grown coffee not a panacea, however. yellowcanine Dec 2013 #40

I would agree with some of that, but the bias against grazing livestock is wrong bhikkhu Dec 2013 #4

It's a case of extremes, though -- too much grazing is definitely bad Flaxbee Dec 2013 #5

They do specifically mention factorey farming, but then they go on bhikkhu Dec 2013 #10

Oh My Gawdess! I didn't think there was one other DU'er here truedelphi Dec 2013 #30

Farming - dairy, cattle, etc. - can be a vital part of an ecosystem if it is done well Flaxbee Dec 2013 #42

Why they have to stupidly imply that non "genetically modified" corn is any better for the planet. enki23 Dec 2013 #6

It's So Hard to Find Any Baked Goods w/o Palm Oil otohara Dec 2013 #8

I know what you mean. Codeine Dec 2013 #11

Even NOT being vegan means adding twenty minutes of Label Reading Time to every grocery trip. RC Dec 2013 #12

Just as tomatoes have been bred based on their shelf life... Blanks Dec 2013 #18

yes, definitely. Grow a few vegetables in the summer - easy ones, like tomatoes, squash, and learn Flaxbee Dec 2013 #22

Health & Environmental concerns aside, bvar22 Dec 2013 #23

Gardens like that one always inspire this question from me: MineralMan Dec 2013 #34

We had a garden that was quite a bit larger than the one pictured. Atman Dec 2013 #39

Palm Oil G_j Dec 2013 #9

How does shade growing coffee make it eco friendly? JVS Dec 2013 #15

It is the canopy that grows over the coffee plants that makes it more ecologically friendly. Blanks Dec 2013 #20

One Thing that Is Killing the Planet MineralMan Dec 2013 #16

Agree with you 100% Flaxbee Dec 2013 #19

Sounds like a challenge! Rex Dec 2013 #21

it won't kill the planet, it will kill us. give the planet a million years to recover after we're dionysus Dec 2013 #38

I'm eating more hemp RandiFan1290 Dec 2013 #24

thanks for the info Liberal_in_LA Dec 2013 #25

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2013 #41