Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If only a handful of feminists are responsible for all that ails DU [View all]grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)33. Why ignore? Too much fun! Love ya:)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If only a handful of feminists are responsible for all that ails DU [View all]
BainsBane
Dec 2013
OP
Your inability to comprehend the meaning of the word "all" is not my problem.
11 Bravo
Dec 2013
#213
+1... I would venture to say that a majority of men on DU are the "good guys"
SomethingFishy
Dec 2013
#216
they are not lumped in. and many men do not feel lumped in. that would be your clue in,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#234
+1000 I got accused of adding flames to the gender war when I posted a piece about
1monster
Dec 2013
#178
And it seems that some on DU are quite horrified by the possibility that those leers being reflected
Squinch
Dec 2013
#71
If you believe that stuff is only a problem in India, you are so very sadly mistaken.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#87
As someone who has no personal problems with you or any of the feminists on the board...
Shandris
Dec 2013
#50
Well by all means, don't speak about the PSA, criticize those you agree with
boston bean
Dec 2013
#100
Obviously being offended at someone's uppity attitude is more important than the issue at hand.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#172
wasnt that a pretty disgustingly offensive Op and thread. and i was told to not take it personally.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#171
So what you are saying is: Ignore others, it is easy. huh. Have you tried that in real life?
The Straight Story
Dec 2013
#9
This is an odd debate. It has plenty of merit, but the lines are so gray in my opinion.
wyldwolf
Dec 2013
#35
best of both worlds and easy answer. see her as a person. if she is interested, you would actually
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#84
why would you suggest it is evo when in fact, from a young boy culture taught you it was your right
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#77
If there are trolls, they would have a wonderful time fostering these fights.
Festivito
Dec 2013
#39
I have most of the MRAs from the He-Man's Group on Ignore, and it's made a huge
Sheldon Cooper
Dec 2013
#43
i am done with this old. too many people are doing just what you did. creating an animosity toward
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#88
you did the exact thing with this post. it is all about creating a hateful caracture to dismiss
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#106
ya know. cant argue, go to this. so silly. obviously i have no desire to shift.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#119
You don't need to make apologies on behalf of women. You need to apologize for your own behavior.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#176
a consistent argument from people that are anti feminism tell us... if we would use a different tone
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#179
Yeah, I was pretty sure it wasn't in your character to apologize for being boorish
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#228
not that you actually addressed the issue that i pointed out to you. so you can better understand
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#229
My purpose was to let the other poster know they were being rude for no good reason
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#231
when tone is used as a dismissal of ones voice, and we know what it as used as,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#232
Part of the problem is that a slogan is no reason to stop using common sense.
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#241
If we ignore, that means you can brow beat the new posters and non-ignorers unchecked
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#59
it is a caricature that is being continuously created of us women. we are allowed opinion, thought
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#96
suspects? choice of words. and do post where i name call or personally attack. i address the issue
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#108
ah nooneman, i am done. i give in good faith, and then the game begins. have a happy holiday.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#120
you would be incorrect. man hater is accepted. i have been called it by at least 5, 6, 7
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#123
the link goes to "that is not your message". and good. i am glad to hear. thank you. but, no
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#129
seems to be two different posters. though i am glad to see that poster finally get one of his posts
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#146
#6 sounds like on your side, hit wrong button. i would like to see your post. jsut saw another
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#154
Its not that simple. You cannot define acceptable behavior and responses for people
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#211
based on my limited knowledge of the threads in question (there have been many)
wyldwolf
Dec 2013
#73
that is what the argument devolved to because it is much easier for SOME men to derail
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#94
yes. because i gave you and others more credit to be honest, than what you obviously deserved.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#112
actually the opposite. saying women is not saying ALL. you know it. i know it.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#175
To state that people claim to be feminists doesn't state they are not in fact
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#102
Do you tell people you "take Obama at his word" when he says he's an American?
Squinch
Dec 2013
#134
Is Obama an anonymous internet poster with patterned behavior of disruptive e-fights?
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#135
you walk into someones sand box, be respectful. i do when walking into another. not respectful,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#189
so, you manner in addressing is to create a false caricature to paint a group of women in an
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#116
you create what you want to argue. one can also argue that we have been thru all this in the past,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#136
the Op says if you do not like us, ignore us. that is nothing to do with banning, nor changing the
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#170
again, you were supposedly giving suport to your argument we want to change TOS and something else.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#180
Duck Dynasty's PREACHER PATRIARCH Phil Robertson: "A good woman is hard to find. Mainly because
Zorra
Dec 2013
#126
I just regret that we're dividing this house when we should be fighting the Republicans. [nt]
Jester Messiah
Dec 2013
#127
and you, woman. because i love you so. and have not heard your voice in so long... YOU...
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#140
Because nothing is more important than alienating more men from the Democratic party.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#168
when you stop creating our behavior into something it isnt, then i will take you seriously. and jeff
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#237
some of us actually do not see it as a game. and ya, we get it that for some, womens issue is a game
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#190
There's way too much that ails DU for anyone or any one group to take full credit.
Silent3
Dec 2013
#224
i am in love. i had to reread a couple times to make sure i was comprehending.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#230