Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Conclusive Evidence: The NSA's expanded powers NEVER protected us from any terror plots. [View all]
The War on Terror's Jedi Mind TrickNational-security officials insist new violations of privacy are essential for keeping Americans safe from terrorbut there's no evidence the programs have stopped any attacks.
JULIAN SANCHEZDEC 23 2013, 4:49 PM ET
A Republican-appointed judge and President Obamas own handpicked Surveillance Review Group both came to the same conclusion last week: The National Security Agencys controversial phone-records program has been of little real value to American security. Yet its defenders continue to insist that it is necessary, clinging desperately to long-debunked claims about foiled terror plots. Their stubbornness fits a decade-long pattern of fear trumping evidence whenever the word terrorism is uttereda pattern it is time to finally break.
Since the disclosure of the NSAs massive domestic phone-records database, authorized under a tortured reading of the Patriot Acts Section 215 authority to obtain business records, intelligence officials and their allies in Congress have claimed it plays a vital role in protecting Americans from dozens of terror attacks. But as the expert panel Obama appointed to review the classified facts concluded, in a report released Wednesday, that just isnt true.
Our review suggests that the information contributed to terrorist investigations by the use of section 215 telephony meta-data was not essential to preventing attacks, the report found, and could readily have been obtained in a timely manner using conventional section 215 orders.
In other words, instead of vacuuming up sensitive information about the call patterns of millions of innocent people, the government could have followed the traditional approach of getting orders for specific suspicious numbers. As for those dozens of attacks, the review groups found that the NSA program generated relevant information in only a small number of cases, and there has been no instance in which NSA could say with confidence that the outcome would have been different without the section 215 telephony meta-data program.
............................
MORE:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/12/the-war-on-terrors-jedi-mind-trick/282620/
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conclusive Evidence: The NSA's expanded powers NEVER protected us from any terror plots. [View all]
kpete
Dec 2013
OP
Security/our government, is NOT supposed to 'head fake' its own people by spying on them.
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#5
Liberals were right, again. I remember a few months ago when we questioned just how
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#4
Prevent, maybe not, but it certainly makes sweeping up suspects' associates effortless.
HereSince1628
Dec 2013
#7
No, it doesn't, did you read the article at all? It has done NOTHING to catch terrorists, and that
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#22