Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If only a handful of feminists are responsible for all that ails DU [View all]kcr
(15,320 posts)244. Wow. Talk about predictable.
Your twisting of BB's words. Very typical of what happens to the feminists on DU. But, I'm glad you have feminists sons. It's nice to see the next generation learning and growing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If only a handful of feminists are responsible for all that ails DU [View all]
BainsBane
Dec 2013
OP
Your inability to comprehend the meaning of the word "all" is not my problem.
11 Bravo
Dec 2013
#213
+1... I would venture to say that a majority of men on DU are the "good guys"
SomethingFishy
Dec 2013
#216
they are not lumped in. and many men do not feel lumped in. that would be your clue in,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#234
+1000 I got accused of adding flames to the gender war when I posted a piece about
1monster
Dec 2013
#178
And it seems that some on DU are quite horrified by the possibility that those leers being reflected
Squinch
Dec 2013
#71
If you believe that stuff is only a problem in India, you are so very sadly mistaken.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#87
As someone who has no personal problems with you or any of the feminists on the board...
Shandris
Dec 2013
#50
Well by all means, don't speak about the PSA, criticize those you agree with
boston bean
Dec 2013
#100
Obviously being offended at someone's uppity attitude is more important than the issue at hand.
redqueen
Dec 2013
#172
wasnt that a pretty disgustingly offensive Op and thread. and i was told to not take it personally.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#171
So what you are saying is: Ignore others, it is easy. huh. Have you tried that in real life?
The Straight Story
Dec 2013
#9
This is an odd debate. It has plenty of merit, but the lines are so gray in my opinion.
wyldwolf
Dec 2013
#35
best of both worlds and easy answer. see her as a person. if she is interested, you would actually
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#84
why would you suggest it is evo when in fact, from a young boy culture taught you it was your right
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#77
If there are trolls, they would have a wonderful time fostering these fights.
Festivito
Dec 2013
#39
I have most of the MRAs from the He-Man's Group on Ignore, and it's made a huge
Sheldon Cooper
Dec 2013
#43
i am done with this old. too many people are doing just what you did. creating an animosity toward
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#88
you did the exact thing with this post. it is all about creating a hateful caracture to dismiss
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#106
ya know. cant argue, go to this. so silly. obviously i have no desire to shift.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#119
You don't need to make apologies on behalf of women. You need to apologize for your own behavior.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#176
a consistent argument from people that are anti feminism tell us... if we would use a different tone
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#179
Yeah, I was pretty sure it wasn't in your character to apologize for being boorish
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#228
not that you actually addressed the issue that i pointed out to you. so you can better understand
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#229
My purpose was to let the other poster know they were being rude for no good reason
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#231
when tone is used as a dismissal of ones voice, and we know what it as used as,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#232
Part of the problem is that a slogan is no reason to stop using common sense.
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#241
If we ignore, that means you can brow beat the new posters and non-ignorers unchecked
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#59
it is a caricature that is being continuously created of us women. we are allowed opinion, thought
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#96
suspects? choice of words. and do post where i name call or personally attack. i address the issue
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#108
ah nooneman, i am done. i give in good faith, and then the game begins. have a happy holiday.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#120
you would be incorrect. man hater is accepted. i have been called it by at least 5, 6, 7
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#123
the link goes to "that is not your message". and good. i am glad to hear. thank you. but, no
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#129
seems to be two different posters. though i am glad to see that poster finally get one of his posts
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#146
#6 sounds like on your side, hit wrong button. i would like to see your post. jsut saw another
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#154
Its not that simple. You cannot define acceptable behavior and responses for people
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#211
based on my limited knowledge of the threads in question (there have been many)
wyldwolf
Dec 2013
#73
that is what the argument devolved to because it is much easier for SOME men to derail
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#94
yes. because i gave you and others more credit to be honest, than what you obviously deserved.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#112
actually the opposite. saying women is not saying ALL. you know it. i know it.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#175
To state that people claim to be feminists doesn't state they are not in fact
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#102
Do you tell people you "take Obama at his word" when he says he's an American?
Squinch
Dec 2013
#134
Is Obama an anonymous internet poster with patterned behavior of disruptive e-fights?
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#135
you walk into someones sand box, be respectful. i do when walking into another. not respectful,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#189
so, you manner in addressing is to create a false caricature to paint a group of women in an
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#116
you create what you want to argue. one can also argue that we have been thru all this in the past,
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#136
the Op says if you do not like us, ignore us. that is nothing to do with banning, nor changing the
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#170
again, you were supposedly giving suport to your argument we want to change TOS and something else.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#180
Duck Dynasty's PREACHER PATRIARCH Phil Robertson: "A good woman is hard to find. Mainly because
Zorra
Dec 2013
#126
I just regret that we're dividing this house when we should be fighting the Republicans. [nt]
Jester Messiah
Dec 2013
#127
and you, woman. because i love you so. and have not heard your voice in so long... YOU...
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#140
Because nothing is more important than alienating more men from the Democratic party.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#168
when you stop creating our behavior into something it isnt, then i will take you seriously. and jeff
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#237
some of us actually do not see it as a game. and ya, we get it that for some, womens issue is a game
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#190
There's way too much that ails DU for anyone or any one group to take full credit.
Silent3
Dec 2013
#224
i am in love. i had to reread a couple times to make sure i was comprehending.
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#230