Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here Is Edward Snowden's Christmas Message [View all]Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)47. that is not what was meant. There was no argument made regarding mind reading.
And that is not what was being referred to a gibberish. The facts are as Snowden stated, we now live in a world where privacy has been effectively abolished. This has nothing to do with mind reading, and those claiming "gibberish" other than you were not misinterpreting that statement to refer to mind reading.
As I said, nice try.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why is it ridiculous? The part that says 'privacy matters' or the part that says children born
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#3
Well that settles it, although a blue link would have sealed the deal.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2013
#38
50 years ago it would have seemed cartoonish and hyperbolic for someone to say
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#7
He doesn't need to be prophetic to read the writing on the wall. There are huge profits
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#18
Perhaps not. Mom and Dad may post to social media about the blessed event...
WorseBeforeBetter
Dec 2013
#99
Got it: It's OK to protect torturers and criminal telecoms if you're a "Democrat."
OnyxCollie
Dec 2013
#70
I made no such case. You, however, justified a "journalist" selling out for money. n/t
ProSense
Dec 2013
#76
Prosense, your time would be much better spent if you ignored your stalkers. And I'm serious
Number23
Dec 2013
#103
I have never seen anyone despise a person so much. Wow, do you have a hard time admitting...
Logical
Dec 2013
#73
"WTF? LOL!" And I quote, in it's entirety, the original content from your link.
Luminous Animal
Dec 2013
#8
I wouldn't be surprised if 30 years from now he is sitting by the fire place in the WH giving the
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#17
Cult of personality is definitely what gets presidents elected, don't you think?
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#40
Do you want to see Bush, who instituted these spying in prison, or just those who exposed the
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#46
Whatever it is it could not be more misguided and just plain wrong. It doesn't matter who the
sabrina 1
Dec 2013
#117
That would be a really dick Move. Though I imagine it doesn't Kinect for some yet.
NuclearDem
Dec 2013
#93
that is not what was meant. There was no argument made regarding mind reading.
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2013
#47
You can tell the Stanford folks that they are engaged in impossible research
nadinbrzezinski
Dec 2013
#101
Yes sure, just make sure you are in a farraday field, have infrared sheilding, and
Warren Stupidity
Dec 2013
#51
Channeling Julian Assange who had a widely derided Christmas message last year
Number23
Dec 2013
#104