Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
5. Would be a long run
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 12:02 PM
Mar 2012

If they invested every dime of that $3.2T in the US they would still be several hundred billion behind the US in direct foreign investment abroad.

Incidentally for all the bemoaning of US companies offshoring, we are also by far the world leader already in foreign companies investing here with $2.9T worth of direct foreign investment at home. Yep - many times more than China's 700-odd billion, which doesn't even rank in the top 5.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2198rank.html?countryName=China&countryCode=ch®ionCode=eas&rank=7#ch

And no that doesn't include foreign ownership of US debt - it's real investment in output. Foreign direct investment, in its classic definition, is defined as a company from one country making a physical investment into building a factory in another country. The direct investment in buildings, machinery and equipment is in contrast with making a portfolio investment, which is considered an indirect investment. In recent years, given rapid growth and change in global investment patterns, the definition has been broadened to include the acquisition of a lasting management interest in a company or enterprise outside the investing firm’s home country. As such, it may take many forms, such as a direct acquisition of a foreign firm, construction of a facility, or investment in a joint venture or strategic alliance with a local firm with attendant input of technology.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

“Confessions of an Economic Hitman” by John Perkins. I'm putting that on my must read list snagglepuss Mar 2012 #1
I for one welcome our new Chinese overlords. geardaddy Mar 2012 #2
Duzy... Junkdrawer Mar 2012 #3
Tell your stepmom's husband that it was Republican policies on free trade Zalatix Mar 2012 #4
Funny, because those were my exact words.... Junkdrawer Mar 2012 #7
And I must add, my condolances for your loss! Zalatix Mar 2012 #8
Would be a long run dmallind Mar 2012 #5
The point of no return probably was nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #6
Chinese steel? The bridge is Chinese. hunter Mar 2012 #9
The U.S.A. no longer has the capacity? That's a lie propagated by Zalatix Mar 2012 #11
If the boss says we can't do it, we can't do it. hunter Mar 2012 #12
Actually our industrial capacity is bellow per wwII nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #13
Then how is the military keeping itself maintained? Zalatix Mar 2012 #16
Where do you think the chips for our smart weapons come from? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #18
Chips, from China? I never knew any country could be that stupid. Zalatix Mar 2012 #19
The question is whether we will have the time to do so nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #21
That explains the increasing # of toll booths bahrbearian Mar 2012 #10
A large contingent of Chinese "invetors" is coming to our little southern town ( pop. 6,000) dixiegrrrrl Mar 2012 #14
Tell them we should get at least a 50" LCD TV for everyone in exchange for Glacier National Park.... Junkdrawer Mar 2012 #15
Could China's long term goal be the relocation of its more polluting industries? Junkdrawer Mar 2012 #17
The food would be better Canuckistanian Mar 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Irony Overload: Is the US...»Reply #5