General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is Pope Francis Really a Progressive Example? [View all]MineralMan
(151,387 posts)I'm seeing things like "more progressive," and qualified statements about being progressive in this thread. Yet, in many other threads, we often see statements that one is either progressive or not progressive.
Is progressivism a relative thing? Are there shades of being progressive? That's really the subject of this thread. Can we call a world leader a Progressive when only statements about a single social justice issue appear to be progressive, while the other issues are either not spoken of or are spoken of in regressive terms.
Someone brought up the death penalty in this thread. The RCC has been opposed to capital punishment for quite a long time. That is a progressive stance, to be sure. But, still, ignoring the rights of half of the population and deliberately thwarting the rights of a minority group (LGBT) are decidedly NOT progressive.
So far, the economic statements of Pope Francis sound good. Will they result in changes? I have no idea. We shall see. I hope so. But the other issues remain.
Is the Pope a Progressive? That was my original question. I think not, and gave my reasons for that thinking. And there it is: my opinion.
Thanks for your thoughtful participation in this thread. I really appreciate it.