Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You know the statement "Women own 60% of US wealth" is just MRA idiocy, right? [View all]Squinch
(59,513 posts)19. .
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
175 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You know the statement "Women own 60% of US wealth" is just MRA idiocy, right? [View all]
Squinch
Dec 2013
OP
She has an enormous amount, so do Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and the Koch Brothers
Bjorn Against
Dec 2013
#16
The 77 cents figure is not a useless talking point to express outrage. It is from the US Census
Squinch
Dec 2013
#18
I guess I could try shrieking if it makes it more fun for people. But my throat is a little
Squinch
Dec 2013
#24
I believe that we were talking about the fallacy of the statement that 60% of American
Squinch
Dec 2013
#26
0% Jeff- really? I know you used to float this 60% of wealth bullshit, so I'm
bettyellen
Dec 2013
#172
it's hilarious after I posted my reply about QEII, I saw your post above with graphic
Pretzel_Warrior
Dec 2013
#15
And that's in rich USA. Worldwide, the UN claims that women have only 5% of cash, 1% of property
ancianita
Dec 2013
#40
The UN keeps the most sweeping data on how women lose the war men wage against them.
ancianita
Dec 2013
#46
So we'll have to use your 2002 numbers so we are both talking about the same thing.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#53
By categories, I mean the breakdowns into for example "below zero and above 500000"
Squinch
Dec 2013
#124
OK, looking at the fourth link you referred me to, if we assume, as has been posited in this thread
Squinch
Dec 2013
#156
But it also shows that 19% of men over 65 are own more than 500,000, compared to 11%
Squinch
Dec 2013
#163
I think this deserves its own post: you misread the data in coming up with your 55.6% number.
Squinch
Dec 2013
#175
Women do live longer on average. Is there more that you wanted to say about that?
Squinch
Dec 2013
#48
Where is the backup to support your claim that wealth of widows is large enough to make
kcr
Dec 2013
#74
And if you read hfojvt's post you will see he makes a large number of unsuported assumptions
intaglio
Dec 2013
#108
And if they have sons, when they die 5 -10 years later at the age of 70-80 it goes to sons...
boston bean
Dec 2013
#114
yeah, when speaking of earning potential, we don't usually include inheritances.
boston bean
Dec 2013
#115
Most of the sources that seemed to be thinking about actual wealth, though, and not
Squinch
Dec 2013
#136
A) Then Ann Romney is penniless? B) The power of money is in spending it, not earning it.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#59
Recognizing this list of men as sole controllers just panders to the patriarchial norm
NoOneMan
Dec 2013
#96
Yep. And even if you keep scrolling down the list, the overwhelming majority are men n/t
kcr
Dec 2013
#91
I think Feminism is just too difficult for the average person to understand.
Notafraidtoo
Dec 2013
#94
It wasn't really VATech saying it. It was the marketing company "MarketingZeus"
Squinch
Dec 2013
#122
I was at a job for three years and accidentally found out that a single, just out of college male
boston bean
Dec 2013
#131
Yes, and it is done to confuse the issue and make it seem like there is no disparity.
boston bean
Dec 2013
#154
They get away with saying that because anti-women bigotry is normalized here on DU.
Starry Messenger
Dec 2013
#155