Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Glenn Greenwald: I Defend Snowden Like MSNBC Defends Obama '24 Hours A Day' [View all]deurbano
(2,996 posts)48. He hasn't left out Fox. (One example below...)
http://www.salon.com/2009/10/22/media_252/
THURSDAY, OCT 22, 2009
What controlling the media really means
The same media whining over criticisms of Fox was happy to be bullied and controlled by the Bush administration.
GLENN GREENWALD
<<...Whatever else is true, Fox has taken on a political role that is very rare, at least in modern times, for a large American news organization. Its news coverage is not merely biased or opinionated; thered be nothing unusual about that. Instead, it is a major participant the leading participant in organizing, promoting and fueling protests, including street protests, against the government. Fox has undertaken a role typically played by media outlets in, say, Venezuela or various unstable, under-developed countries sponsoring rather than reporting on protests against the government and it is difficult to recall any recent example that is similar.
Fox has every right to do that, but the pretense that it is a news organization is ludicrous transparently so and there isnt anything remotely wrong with the Obama White House saying so. Even those with high tolerance levels for blatant double standards should have a very hard time watching Bush officials of all people along with their media-star allies whine about criticisms of Fox coming from the White House, when the prior eight years were marked by an administration that attempted to dominate and control media coverage more than any in modern history, along with a media that seemed perfectly content, even happy, to be controlled...>>
THURSDAY, OCT 22, 2009
What controlling the media really means
The same media whining over criticisms of Fox was happy to be bullied and controlled by the Bush administration.
GLENN GREENWALD
<<...Whatever else is true, Fox has taken on a political role that is very rare, at least in modern times, for a large American news organization. Its news coverage is not merely biased or opinionated; thered be nothing unusual about that. Instead, it is a major participant the leading participant in organizing, promoting and fueling protests, including street protests, against the government. Fox has undertaken a role typically played by media outlets in, say, Venezuela or various unstable, under-developed countries sponsoring rather than reporting on protests against the government and it is difficult to recall any recent example that is similar.
Fox has every right to do that, but the pretense that it is a news organization is ludicrous transparently so and there isnt anything remotely wrong with the Obama White House saying so. Even those with high tolerance levels for blatant double standards should have a very hard time watching Bush officials of all people along with their media-star allies whine about criticisms of Fox coming from the White House, when the prior eight years were marked by an administration that attempted to dominate and control media coverage more than any in modern history, along with a media that seemed perfectly content, even happy, to be controlled...>>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Glenn Greenwald: I Defend Snowden Like MSNBC Defends Obama '24 Hours A Day' [View all]
ProSense
Dec 2013
OP
He corrected himself when challenged. He was happy to throw the gross hyperbole out there
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#49
A RICH clown, who's getting even richer. Hey GG, answer these questions, won't ya? Inquiring minds
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2013
#42
You betcha! Actual "whistleblowers" are finally beginning to question this asshole.....
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2013
#43
Kristen Welker would know that isn't the case. She was speaking for herself. Can't stand her. n/t
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2013
#7
Another possibility is that you side with the NSA in the metadata-dragnet issue
Penicilino
Dec 2013
#19
This is why Greenwald is full of shit. MSNBC doesn't "defend Obama 24 hours a day"!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Dec 2013
#22
That's pretty nasty, IMO. But hey, I suppose when they've got no argument, a nasty pic will have to
MADem
Dec 2013
#84
As I posted to that non-comprehending person and apparently need to do so again here
Number23
Dec 2013
#109
The only consistent defender of Obama on MSNBC is the Rev. Everyone else has taken unnecessary shots
Drunken Irishman
Dec 2013
#40
I would hope the GG gives a sit down interview to someone who's not intimidated by him. Like here:
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2013
#45
Agreed. But I think we left Orwell in the rear view mirror some time ago.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2013
#95