Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I can't believe I have to say this: highway tolls are not a conspiracy to destroy freedom. [View all]MineralMan
(151,043 posts)9. The only problem I have with tolls on the Interstate system is if there
is no practical alternate route.
For example, Pennsylvania wants to make I-80 a toll road. The Pennsylvania Turnpike, which is a combination of I-76 and I-70 is already a toll road. It costs a motorist in a passenger car about $36 to cross Pennsylvania in an east-west direction or the reverse. I-80 is a free alternative across the state. If both become toll highways, it will be next to impossible to cross that state without paying a toll. Secondary highways are too convoluted.
If I have no business in Pennsylvania, but must cross it to get to another state, then I would be forced to pay a toll to do so. That seems to me to be a problem with US citizens freedom of travel. It's not that I don't have the $36, but the principle of the thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I can't believe I have to say this: highway tolls are not a conspiracy to destroy freedom. [View all]
TheWraith
Mar 2012
OP
They are not a conspiracy to destroy freedom. It's just another regressive tax.
denverbill
Mar 2012
#6
I don't think taking the less regressive option necessarily makes it progressive.
denverbill
Mar 2012
#19
One of the reasons people that live on the East Coast of this country pay inflated prices
Ikonoklast
Mar 2012
#47
It's right there in line item 1: "Broaden Medicare tax base for high-income taxpayers: $210.2 bil"
TheWraith
Mar 2012
#56
If you strategically oppose tolls, it is easier tactically to whip up opposition on privacy grounds
FarCenter
Mar 2012
#12
It really is amazing that your view is so faith based you can't acknowledge facts.
TheWraith
Mar 2012
#25
"Cronies get rich, people who have to drive to their jobs get screwed."
woo me with science
Mar 2012
#45
we could spend a tiny bit less on the welfare parasite military and not NEED highway tolls at all nt
msongs
Mar 2012
#23
I'd much rather see a federal tax rather than toll roads to maintain and improve highway
LanternWaste
Mar 2012
#34
While I don't like the regressive nature of toll roads, I otherwise agree with you totally
NeedleCast
Mar 2012
#41
GSP high-speed lanes are 55 mph, converted booths and on-off booths are 15 mph.
FarCenter
Mar 2012
#61
If you are too stupid to avoid a tollbooth you shouldn't be on the road in the first place
snooper2
Mar 2012
#76
CA St Rte 91, AKA Riverside Freeway has 10 miles of "toll" lanes privately administered
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2012
#64
You can't believe you have to say it because you have not really considered your position
jpgray
Mar 2012
#67
It's a regressive tax that shovels the money of a captive market into private hands.
myrna minx
Mar 2012
#68
So you don't mind adding one regressive tax on top of an existing regressive tax?
Zalatix
Mar 2012
#75