Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
14. Agree that we're a cabal,
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:31 PM
Dec 2013

disagree with the remainder.

First, Goldman Sachs is not involved in ALL races throughout the U.S. They're involved in the ones in which they have a direct interest, namely governorships, key Congressional seats and pretty much all Senate seats. That leaves all the rest. Secondly, money doesn't always buy the seat. A reminder that Meg Whitman outspent Jerry Brown by something like 3 to 1 and Brown still won. There are lots of examples of this. The lesson here is popularity (and populism) can beat out money.

As for passivity, I think I'm advocating exactly the opposite. I'm advocating activism. Direct, unrelenting activism. That is what the Founders left to us. If WE don't like our politicians then WE have the power to change (gerrymandering notwithstanding -- a whole other thread).

A "bloody violent revolt?" No thanks. I've no desire to see anyone killed or maimed. "Bloody violent revolts" tend to have horrendous unintended consequences and I want to part of it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And we are already being urged to line up behind woo me with science Dec 2013 #1
Urged? More like bludgeoned. I and the rest of DU will vote. Good luck Doctor_J Dec 2013 #3
Some progressives chose not to Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #9
+1 "Voting for a Third-Way candidate is no better than voting for a Republican" L0oniX Dec 2013 #12
+ 1 n/t MissDeeds Dec 2013 #21
"Sea-Change" Because of "See-No-Change" n/t fredamae Dec 2013 #26
They don't even bother to give lip service to the liberals any more Doctor_J Dec 2013 #27
What exactly ProSense Dec 2013 #2
Hey, man, don't be gettin' in the way of the Grand Narrative. byronius Dec 2013 #13
A few more disturbing snips from the article: KoKo Dec 2013 #4
Obama and his bankster staff Ichingcarpenter Dec 2013 #5
Larry Summers and Obama. See any smoke? L0oniX Dec 2013 #8
holder is absolutely worthless frylock Dec 2013 #18
Are you kidding me? zeemike Dec 2013 #29
Yet another indication it's time to break up the big banks. pa28 Dec 2013 #25
wall street criminals are too big to prosecute doncha know nt msongs Dec 2013 #6
Just like BushCo MissDeeds Dec 2013 #22
This is a Third Way president. Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #7
The country will turn into a cabal of mega corporations which is where it's headed now. L0oniX Dec 2013 #11
Agree that we're a cabal, Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #14
Goldman Sachs = metaphor, "bloody violent revolt?" as in "let them eat cake" style. L0oniX Dec 2013 #15
I'm a simple-minded broad. Le Taz Hot Dec 2013 #17
A Gandhi type approach is the only thing that will work. zeemike Dec 2013 #30
From the beginning. Autumn Dec 2013 #10
How many bu$h installed people are still in the Obama Justice Department? RC Dec 2013 #16
Because people didn't vote for Change. jsr Dec 2013 #20
Oh but we did, in mass! RC Dec 2013 #23
"There was little of the usual Administrative house cleaning when Obama was sworn in." Enthusiast Dec 2013 #34
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #19
Dimon invited Obama to the White House for lunch to receive JPM's employee of the month award. pa28 Dec 2013 #24
Unrec for typical NeoDU, clueless, half-truth, 180 degrees out-of-whack Obama bashing. nt tridim Dec 2013 #28
Rec for good old DU holding their feet to the fire activism! Scuba Dec 2013 #31
Another Recommend! KoKo Dec 2013 #32
I have said it before and will say it again, Obama works for the truedelphi Dec 2013 #33
Recommended 1000X and kicked too. Enthusiast Dec 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How tied is this Administ...»Reply #14