Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
72. Yes, Congress can, all they have to say is UPS is the Post Office.
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 04:48 PM
Dec 2013
Article 1, Section 8,

The Congress shall have Power....

[Paragraph 7]To establish Post Offices and post Roads;


That is all the US Constitution says about Post offices. Stamps were 63 years in the future (70 years if you use the US use of Postal Stamps), thus if you sent a letter, you paid someone to take the mail, who then transferred that letter to other people, most of whom expected payment from the receiver of the letter. The Postal Stamp was invented to show payment HAD been made by the sender and whoever had the contract to drop of that letter did NOT have to depend on the receiver paying for the letter.

While the concept of pre paying for postage had been kicked around since the 1680s (When one person used a hand stamp on the letter to show someone prepaid to have the letter delivered), till England adopted its "Penney Black" in 1840, the norm was the receiver had to pay for delivery of the letter.

In the US, the Postal Stamp was NOT adopted till 1847 (Through some local Postal Master issued stamps as early as 1845).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postage_stamp

Even after that date, you had to go to the Post Office to pick up your mail. Home Delivery in urban areas did not start in the US till 1863 and Rural Free Delivery did not start till 1890 (Experimental only). In 1893 Congress finally approved the idea but it took till 1896 to get it started but not fully implemented nationwide till 1902:

http://www.postalmuseum.si.edu/exhibits/2b2_reaching.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Free_Delivery

Now the above involved letter service only, parcel post did not start till 1913:
http://www.postalmuseum.si.edu/exhibits/2b2f_parcel.html

Through the line between mail and packages was thin. In one case in the late 1800s a contractor who was building a bank determined it was cheaper to send each brick he needed by mail then by wagon. The Post Office at that point put a weight limit on packages, which of course force people to work around those limitations, which lead to Parcel Post .

1912-1920 is considered by many to be the height of the Post Office. Parcel Post was in place, RFD was in place. Most urban areas had twice a day mail delivery (Yes TWICE a day, six days a week, you could send a letter and get a letter in response on the same day). You could even deposit money into a savings (But NOT checking) accounts at the Post Office (This was implemented do to many immigrants from Europe expecting the US Post Office to provide such service, for in Europe, the National Post Offices in many nations provided such services. The banks complained and the Permission to provide such services was removed by Congressional action, but the Post Office retain the use of Postal Money Orders to this day). This system lasted till 1966. Its peak was doing the banking crisis of 1930-1933 (Unlike the banks, the Post Office remained open). You had to give 60 days notice to withdraw AND had to pay in DOLLARS (remember this is the day when most people used CHANGE not Dollar Bills, for example Streetcar fare was a Nickel, Bread was 8 cents, 1 pound of hamburger was 22 cents a pound, A dozen eggs was 18 cents). For deposits of less then a dollar the Post Office issued Savings stamps (which were big during WWII).

http://postalmuseum.si.edu/museum/1d_PostalSavings.html

The Commercial banks never liked the Post Office Bank, and the restrictions imposed on it was to discourage its use, i.e. dollar deposit only, at a time where most people only saved in terms of dimes, 60 day notice to withdraw and no checking. All designed to discouraged the use of the Post Office System. The problem was people still preferred it till the Banks finally had Congress outlaw it in 1966. Today it is proposed to bring it bank, this time with checking.

Also remember till long after WWII, most companies paid their employees in CASH not CHECK. While the movement to Checks instead of Cash started around 1900, it was still a very tiny minority when the bank crisis hit in 1930. One of the reasons for the bank crisis was employers needed to withdraw money from their banks to pay their employees, when other were also withdrawing money from the banks. Thus the Federal Government started to encourage institution of checks during the 1930s, and embraced the concept of Free Checking coming out of Pittsburgh. After WWII, the norm became issuing of checks, but as late as the 1980s the US Government issued troops in basic training checks and then had them cash them right then and there, thus the troops had cash. In some ways the worse of both worlds. Today the Military wants its Soldiers to have bank accounts for direct deposits

When the conversion to checks

By far the largest object ever moved through the Parcel Post System was a bank. Not all at once, of course, but practically brick by brick. When W. H. Coltharp, in charge of building the Bank of Vernal, Utah was confronted with the task of getting bricks for the bank, he turned to the Parcel Post Service. The bricks which Coltharp wanted were produced by the Salt Lake Pressed Brick Company, located 127 miles from Vernal. Instead of paying four times the cost of the bricks for them to be shipped by wagon freight, Coltharp arranged for the bricks to be shipped in 50-pound packages, through the Parcel Post Service, a ton at a time.

The Salt Lake City and Vernal postmasters as well as the Uintah Railroad, all responsible for hauling the bricks became frantic as tons of bricks piled up. Memos flew between postmasters and finally to Postmaster General Burleson. Although it was too late to stem the tide of bricks which threatened to overwhelm the tiny post office, Burleson and his staff rewrote the affecting legislation to limit to 200 pounds the total weight of parcel post which one consignor could send to one consignee in a day. In a letter announcing the amendment to the legislation, he noted that "it is not the intent of the United States Postal Service that buildings be shipped through the mail." In the end, all 40 tons of bricks were delivered for Coltharp's bank.

One of the oddest parcel post packages ever sent was "mailed" from Grangeville to Lewiston, Idaho on February 19, 1914. The 48 1/2 pound package was just short of the 50 pound limit. The name of the package was May Pierstorff, three months short of six years old.

May's parents decided to send their daughter for a visit with her grandparents, but were reluctant to pay the train fare. Noticing that there were no provisions in the parcel post regulations specifically concerning sending a person through the mails, they decided to "mail" their daughter. The postage, 53-cents in parcel post stamps, was attached to May's coat. This little girl traveled the entire distance to Lewiston in the train's mail compartment and was delivered to her grandmother's home by the mail clerk on duty, Leonard Mochel.


http://www.postalmuseum.si.edu/exhibits/2b2f_parcel.html

Now, can Congress abolish the Post Office? In my opinion yes, all Congress has to do is to provide Post Offices where people can go to pick up and drop off mail. Prior to the reforms of the 1840s, that was private companies, often local shop keepers. After the reforms of the 1840s (the introduction of Postal Stamps), it remained local shop keepers. Delivery to and from such shop keepers were by private contractors (Wells Fargo fought for the right to pick up and drop off such mail, it was a steady source of income for them, the passengers and other things shipped was extra profit, it was the postal contractors that paid for the horse, the feed for the horses, the wagon and the drivers).

Urban areas were not forgotten, in most areas mail was dropped off by local people, after 1890 by streetcar operators, and then by bus operators. This was a subsidy to such operation provided by the Post Office (and provided till the 1960s). Airlines were also given this subsidy, which continues to this day, in the form of space available mail service (i.e. if the airline has space NOT taken up by Luggage it gets to haul US Mail, thus rare for an airline to run empty in its baggage compartments) and in the 1920s and 1930s with direct payments to Airlines (Not to haul mail, but to run so mail may be sent by Air). Air Mail was a service that the mail would go by Air instead of by Train, but by the 1960s all mail was going by Air anyway, so Air Mail was discontinued.

Now the above "Subsidy" is NOT a direct subsidy in that the Post Office does not and did not pay for these services but the mail contract gave both the Streetcars operators, the bus operators and the Airlines a steady source of Income they could count on. Direct subsidies were much rarer, such as the payment to the Airlines in the 1920s and 1930s.

A problem for the Post Office Post WWII, was the collapse of the Passenger Train Service. Such Services were tied in with Express packages services and mail sent by train. These were all faster then regular freight service. With the collapse of Passenger Train Service the Post Office had to shift to private truck haulers. Such Contractors were preferred to the Post Office having their own trucks, for one of the mandates from Congress was for the Post Office to support local businesses. Thus, when it could, the Post Office used public Transit to drop off its mail to local post offices, and when it could not used its own trucks. On the other hand, for shipping from one main post office to another, after the demise of most passenger train service, the Post Office started to use private Commercial trucks drivers. Thus unlike UPS and Federal Express, the Post Office has a lot of sub contractors sending the mail to where it belongs. The final delivery is done by Postal Employees but how it arrived at his Post Office included being hauled by private contractors (through shifting the mail, and bagging the mail was done by postal employers, private contractors just hauled the mail bags, like Stage Coaches did in the days of the Wild West).

Thus the Postal Service is a very complex set of public and private businesses working together to get the mail delivered. The post WWII era saw the Post Office losing the ability to use public transit as a way to get mail to local post office for later delivery and thus had to adopt it own trucks to do so. This required moving most Large Post Offices from Downtown areas, where the trains operated to more Suburban areas that were easier for Semi Trailers to enter and exit. That move started in the 1960s and is still going on (Through most large downtown post office moved such mail service to other areas by the 1980s, retaining just a post office to pick up and drop off mail in their old downtown offices).

The Zip Code was adopted by the Post Office to ease shipment of mail and packages. The first three digits indicate which main post office that packages is to be handled by, the last two digits the local post office (and the four digit extension the block the house is on). It ended the need for the Post Office to object to names of local governments, for the Post Office preferred unique names over common names (Came up about five years ago in Allegheny County PA. Some people in South Park Township wanted the Post Office to change the name used on their Addresses from Pleasant Hills, 15236 AND Library Pa 15129 to South Park PA. The Post Office opposed the name change for Library PA was the ONLY Library in the names of Post Offices in the US. On the other hand, there were several South Parks (and the Post Office took no position as to Pleasant Hills, another Common name in its data base).

Just pointing out, yes Congress can abolish the Post Office and transfer its function to private companies (as was the norm prior to the Civil War in Urban Areas AND the norm in Rural Area till 1896)

Side Note: 1896 is a date one should take note when one reads. That is the year the Democratic Party of the US, decided it was a Progressive Party not a me-to Republican Party. As a progressive party its strength was in Rural America more then urban America (Given that more people lived in Rural Areas then Urban Areas till 1920 not a bad base to build on in 1896) the GOP did all it could to undermine that Rural support. One way was to provide what the Democrats proposed, Rural Free Delivery. With it already on the books, meant one less item people could use to justify voting Democratic. Yes, cutting into the Democratic Base one piece at a time is a time honored GOP tradition, just because the GOP does it today, does NOT mean they never did it is the past. This passage of RFD is an example of cutting into the Democratic Base in 1896.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't hear any reports about the postal service scrambling to deliver late Christmas packages liberal N proud Dec 2013 #1
They also have to deliver to everyone. riqster Dec 2013 #5
I think they could raise their rates MynameisBlarney Dec 2013 #8
It depends on where they're shipping to and from. pnwmom Dec 2013 #41
They are... mimi85 Dec 2013 #85
"They" cannot. SomeGuyInEagan Dec 2013 #89
My wife and I have been going out of our way to use the USPS more and more. onehandle Dec 2013 #2
Us, too. riqster Dec 2013 #3
46 cents USPS vs $12.50 UPS...... for a LETTER! ErikJ Dec 2013 #35
That is why they are trying to take that business away from the USPS. riqster Dec 2013 #37
EXACTLY...!!!! ardy Dec 2013 #48
Privatization mean PROFITS for the greedy. glinda Dec 2013 #58
As a former USPS city carrier, I never use anything but the post office. Those Nay Dec 2013 #91
I always use the post office wilt the stilt Dec 2013 #4
Good one to use. I just don't hear many complaints in my area. It's mostly wingnuts who say it here. freshwest Dec 2013 #32
Good thread malaise Dec 2013 #6
And to you! riqster Dec 2013 #7
The Post Office is in the Constitution--they CAN'T get rid of it Demeter Dec 2013 #9
They could privatize it. Another way of killing it. riqster Dec 2013 #12
No, they can't. Not any more than they have. Demeter Dec 2013 #18
Yes, Congress can, all they have to say is UPS is the Post Office. happyslug Dec 2013 #72
Awesome post. riqster Dec 2013 #73
They may not be able to get rid of it entirely mac56 Dec 2013 #13
Unfortunately they could. They already got the ruling back in 1969 or 1970. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #71
I always use the USPS to send things. HappyMe Dec 2013 #10
Congress doesn't work for Us - they work for the 1% FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #11
You got that right. nt riqster Dec 2013 #14
WTF? Octoberfurst Dec 2013 #15
The reason? The payments from FedEx and UPS. riqster Dec 2013 #20
This was a poison pill . . . aggiesal Dec 2013 #36
The reason? BobUp Dec 2013 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author RandiFan1290 Dec 2013 #59
I live in a rural area. I can see the post office down the street. mountain grammy Dec 2013 #16
Oh yeah. Also some blighted urban areas. riqster Dec 2013 #19
My job requires me to be shipping packages all the time. Jetboy Dec 2013 #17
Replace "even though" in your OP title with "because" n/t Fumesucker Dec 2013 #21
When you are right, you're right. riqster Dec 2013 #26
+1 a significant amount.......nt Enthusiast Dec 2013 #82
Yep, USPS handles 160 billion pieces of mail per year, mbperrin Dec 2013 #22
the last sentence up there is the funniest damn thing iv'e read all week... Volaris Dec 2013 #87
I don't understand the hate/complaining about USPS Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2013 #23
That last sentence is the killer question. riqster Dec 2013 #29
The PTB say we aren't using it anymore AllyCat Dec 2013 #56
Maybe not as much as we did in "the olden days" Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2013 #75
I agree with you, but the media tells us otherwise. AllyCat Dec 2013 #94
I hate that this is happening, and speak publicly about it often. byronius Dec 2013 #24
The USPS got all my xmas packages there a day before they said they would this year. cags Dec 2013 #25
Republican cronies have their eyes on some of the most valuable randr Dec 2013 #27
Diane Feinstein's husband is selling it off at this summerschild Dec 2013 #39
Like vultures pickin at the bones of America randr Dec 2013 #65
Is HR 1351 still being pushed or is there a new fix for this GOP nonsense? KurtNYC Dec 2013 #28
I believe it is still being blocked by the GOP. riqster Dec 2013 #44
We really can't say this enough, so I hope that your thread senseandsensibility Dec 2013 #30
USPS is a bargain ramapo Dec 2013 #31
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2013 #33
Thanks back atcha, Uncle Joe. riqster Dec 2013 #34
My First Thought When I Heard of the FedEx/UPS Fiasco Stainless Dec 2013 #38
And all the Fox Addicts spreading the lies about how the USPS is soooo bad. riqster Dec 2013 #40
Kicking! go west young man Dec 2013 #42
If only one of these three services survives I prefer it be the US Postal Service. GoneFishin Dec 2013 #43
If the USPS goes down, triple rates AND less service from the other two. riqster Dec 2013 #45
A reader pointed this out: riqster Dec 2013 #46
We need to fight this. I live 10 miles from the nearest post office. jwirr Dec 2013 #47
I think the subject line of that blog post is a little extreme! George II Dec 2013 #49
Seems fair to me. But then, UPS isn't giving me tens of thousands of dollars in bribes. riqster Dec 2013 #54
Well, let's just look at the contribution from UPS... George II Dec 2013 #68
weak attempt nt U4ikLefty Dec 2013 #88
Reality George II Dec 2013 #92
These same "bribes" are what is ruining this country by taking away any semblance of Representative Dustlawyer Dec 2013 #50
"The Ed Show" gets it right - mitty14u2 Dec 2013 #51
USPS Flat Rate Priority shipping. Free franking. Best things ever for personal and small business. haele Dec 2013 #52
This post should be an OP. riqster Dec 2013 #53
Excellent post malaise Dec 2013 #64
Amen CaptCaribbean Dec 2013 #55
Much of the country is a right-wing echo chamber. riqster Dec 2013 #60
They busted Madame Marie, too. n/t Orsino Dec 2013 #61
Soul crushing Shibainu Dec 2013 #62
Not directed at you. riqster Dec 2013 #63
Large business shipping is what UPS was set up to do. haele Dec 2013 #67
Well put! riqster Dec 2013 #69
Oh no! I'm a rural carrier and saw you guys out hoofing it also! GobBluth Dec 2013 #70
Indeed! riqster Dec 2013 #74
Strange coincidence: JDPriestly Dec 2013 #66
Whoever has the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, MAKES THE RULES. blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #76
The true "golden rule". riqster Dec 2013 #79
Our New and Improved Congress 2.0 does NOTHING unless bribed to do so. Buns_of_Fire Dec 2013 #77
The "capitalism can do it better" meme is pure bullshit KansDem Dec 2013 #78
Where are the mass xxqqqzme Dec 2013 #80
This is an example of, "Our Party leaving us." Enthusiast Dec 2013 #81
One more example of taking over swilton Dec 2013 #83
Bought cheaply Moral Compass Dec 2013 #84
K&R. USPS regularly delivers for UPS/FedEx in areas that the others deem "unprofitable". El_Johns Dec 2013 #86
Subsidizing is the word all right. riqster Dec 2013 #93
USPS should offer encrypted privacy rights protected email, as well as mobile internet/phone service grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congress is being bribed ...»Reply #72