Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hi, DUers! A post-Christmas Friday Afternoon Challenge for you: “The Beautiful Couples!” [View all]CTyankee
(68,152 posts)45. You know, that's true. There is no chiarascuro!
but that isn't it. The answer, however, is so simple, really...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hi, DUers! A post-Christmas Friday Afternoon Challenge for you: “The Beautiful Couples!” [View all]
CTyankee
Dec 2013
OP
I was gonna say what they have in common is bare butts, but # 5 blows my theory.
Shrike47
Dec 2013
#3
Boucher and Fragonard are in the Rococco era. Three others are in neoclassicisim.
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#44
You know, I always get the image on Google blurry first but then it "self corrects" on my computer.
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#31
Boucher was more about butts really...this wasn't one of them but his biggie at the Louvre was...
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#29
Yes, that is why. I just thought it was interesting after perusing a big art book on the Louvre.
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#53
The Bolt is a different genre from all the others. It is Fragonard and it is Rococco.
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#55
Altho on second thought I did look at the fabric more and it seemed to be pretty exciting!
CTyankee
Dec 2013
#61