Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NY Times Benghazi Bombshell: Attack spurred by anti-Islam Video [View all]pacalo
(24,850 posts)26. This one, too...
(All bolding is mine.)
But the Republican arguments appear to conflate purely local extremist organizations like Ansar al-Shariah with Al Qaedas international terrorist network. The only intelligence connecting Al Qaeda to the attack was an intercepted phone call that night from a participant in the first wave of the attack to a friend in another African country who had ties to members of Al Qaeda, according to several officials briefed on the call. But when the friend heard the attackers boasts, he sounded astonished, the officials said, suggesting he had no prior knowledge of the assault.
Al Qaeda was having its own problems penetrating the Libyan chaos. Three weeks after the attack, on Oct. 3, 2012, leaders of the groups regional affiliate, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, sent a letter to a lieutenant about efforts to crack the new territory. The leaders said they had sent four teams to try to establish footholds in Libya. But of the four, only two in the southern Sahara were able to enter Libyan territory and lay the first practical bricks there, the letter said.
The letter, left behind when the groups leaders fled French troops in Mali, was later obtained and released by The Associated Press. It tallied up the spectacular acts of terrorism the group had accomplished around the region, but it made no mention of Benghazi or any other attacks in Libya.
Al Qaeda was having its own problems penetrating the Libyan chaos. Three weeks after the attack, on Oct. 3, 2012, leaders of the groups regional affiliate, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, sent a letter to a lieutenant about efforts to crack the new territory. The leaders said they had sent four teams to try to establish footholds in Libya. But of the four, only two in the southern Sahara were able to enter Libyan territory and lay the first practical bricks there, the letter said.
The letter, left behind when the groups leaders fled French troops in Mali, was later obtained and released by The Associated Press. It tallied up the spectacular acts of terrorism the group had accomplished around the region, but it made no mention of Benghazi or any other attacks in Libya.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Are you trying to bust Darrel Issa's bubble or just trying to spread the truth?
Thinkingabout
Dec 2013
#1
I feel sure it will not be repeated on FOX or a report from the Oversight Committee.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2013
#22
I wonder if Bachmann found this out and has since kept a very low profile. Of course that could be
monmouth3
Dec 2013
#7
Agree...NYT...takes Murky and Mucks it further...Maybe its the Truth...Maybe Not...
KoKo
Dec 2013
#29
I followed the events that day. There certainly were video-related protests in the mix.
TwilightGardener
Dec 2013
#10
RW especially Ts able to accept NYT when facts go their way & reject when facts against them. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2013
#58
Power is more important to many Republicans than the truth. Tea baggers can't recognize truth. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Dec 2013
#16
What's that I hear echoing around the halls of Congress? "BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, ooops, never mind!"
George II
Dec 2013
#18
Paging John McCain. There is a blue apology phone with a direct line to Susan Rice at reception
Number23
Dec 2013
#23
But, this won't outweigh that meaty 60 Minutes story from a month or two back
NewJeffCT
Dec 2013
#31
Because the New York Times did the investigation, the right will dismiss it. The right only
bluestate10
Dec 2013
#33