General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Paul Krugman Blog- Bitcoin is Evil [View all]
Its always important, and always hard, to distinguish positive economics how things work from normative economics how things should be. Indeed, on many of the macro issues Ive written about it has been obvious that large numbers of economists cant bring themselves to make that distinction; they dislike activist government on political grounds, and this leads them to make really bad arguments about why fiscal stimulus cant work and monetary stimulus will be disastrous. I dont, by the way, think that this effect is symmetric: although people like Robert Lucas were quick to accuse people like Christy Romer of fabricating macro arguments to support a big-government agenda, this didnt actually happen.
But I come now to talk not about macro but about money specifically, about Bitcoin and all that.
So far almost all of the Bitcoin discussion has been positive economics can this actually work? And I have to say that Im still deeply unconvinced. To be successful, money must be both a medium of exchange and a reasonably stable store of value. And it remains completely unclear why BitCoin should be a stable store of value. Brad DeLong puts it clearly:
Placing a ceiling on the value of gold is mining technology, and the prospect that if its price gets out of whack for long on the upside a great deal more of it will be created. Placing a ceiling on the value of the dollar is the Federal Reserves role as actual dollar source, and its commitment not to allow deflation to happen.
Placing a ceiling on the value of bitcoins is computer technology and the form of the hash function until the limit of 21 million bitcoins is reached. Placing a floor on the value of bitcoins is what, exactly?
more
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evil/?_r=0