General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: More than a million people lose unemployment benefits today, because Jesus, or something. [View all]freedom fighter jh
(1,784 posts). . . that paying taxes doesn't fulfill the Biblical requirement to help the poor.
That is not an argument against government money going to help for the poor. It is just an argument for personal help for the poor.
The poor get just enough support from government to keep them alive and not rebelling openly. I wish my tax money went to help them, rather than to support a machine that functions by threatening death. But I think Blanket Statements is saying (correct me if I'm wrong, Blanket) that taxes and government are just a separate issue from the mandate on the individual to help the poor. And even though I'm not Christian, I think it works well that way: Do try to get government to use our money less for destruction and more for human purposes like feeding the needy, but don't assume that that's how you help the needy. Helping the needy takes a separate, personal effort.
I suppose if government worked very well all around the world, there would be no poor, so how could you help them, and then how could you fulfill your Biblical obligation? But I don't think we have to worry about that too much.