Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Man shoots self in buttocks in Brighton Home Depot with gun he was carrying [View all]NutmegYankee
(16,477 posts)54. People are sometimes hurt or killed in accidents.
There are often tort liability in such cases, but criminal liability is very specific. Let's say you are looking one way (not forward) and walk briskly into an elderly woman, knocking her down and breaking her hip. I wouldn't support having the man charged with battery on the woman as it wasn't intentional. That said, the man is obviously liable for civil damages for medical care for the woman.
The problem with guns is that it's practically impossible to have a discussion without extreme emotion clouding the issue. I understand that people strongly oppose concealed carry. But that isn't a justification to stop a liberal approach to criminal punishment.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Man shoots self in buttocks in Brighton Home Depot with gun he was carrying [View all]
hue
Dec 2013
OP
"Not all accidents are due to negligence" - correct, some are due to downright stupidity!
George II
Dec 2013
#72
No luck involved. No trigger pulled itself. If a person is so unconscious that they
mbperrin
Dec 2013
#87
Given that hunting takes of deer far outnumber any other use in the United States
NutmegYankee
Dec 2013
#106
would you still be saying the same if that "accidental" shot had injured or killed someone?
niyad
Dec 2013
#41
Agree with no jail for this, but a fine and loss of ability to carry weapon in public is justified
groundloop
Dec 2013
#32
The fact that he shot himself in a public place is proof of irresponsibility to me.
MH1
Dec 2013
#61
LOL, I am pro-gun. I have a CC license and own many guns. But the responsibility....
Logical
Dec 2013
#92
You are not driving a car for self defense. You have to drive a car. You don't have to carry a gun.
Logical
Dec 2013
#121
Instead of Home Depot, what if he'd been picking up a child at a day care center? nt
pinboy3niner
Dec 2013
#15
You betcha! It's his freedumbs and liberties to shoot hisself wherever he wants.
valerief
Dec 2013
#111
The thread I posted in about this topic last night was locked by the GD hosts.
Vashta Nerada
Dec 2013
#114