Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
9. It was a PR stunt... If A & E were really put off and wanted to make a statement about
Tue Dec 31, 2013, 09:01 AM
Dec 2013

Phil's interview, they wouldn't have been playing non-stop back to back re-runs of DD over the last couple of weeks. The "suspension" would have actually effected new taping in the spring and and editing of already filmed shows that are about to hit in January. And it's not as if they went in and pulled all the "Phil" merchandise. The Walmart kiosk was still full of their crap.

And like many have said, it's not exactly like anyone who has ever seen the show or knows a bit about the DD background, would have thought that Phil was a tolerant, old fun-living guy. I think most would judge the book by the cover they choose to wear. The show is smart enough to just make up slapstick, dumb ass, redneck humor. I find the "skits" with the Uncle the funniest. If it weren't of Uncle Si, the show wouldn't be on anymore. The Phil and Miss Kay scenes are normally boring. The wives are full on stepford, and they are there for the money.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yet A&E and Robertsons win this battle and set back equal rights for women gays and black americans. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #1
It was never about rights. It was about money. Arkansas Granny Dec 2013 #2
They deserve to lose advertisers just as Skidmore Dec 2013 #8
It was a PR stunt... If A & E were really put off and wanted to make a statement about glowing Dec 2013 #9
"Classic Coke" Feral Child Dec 2013 #12
Well-- YarnAddict Dec 2013 #4
This is how. theHandpuppet Dec 2013 #5
In addition to other statements, kids are raised on this crap. They look at what the adults around jtuck004 Dec 2013 #10
Informative post. Thanks. k&r n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #3
Too bad he didn't try that with my grandma. riqster Dec 2013 #6
The 3 women I talked about didn't take shit. Are_grits_groceries Dec 2013 #14
My Grandma would have thought dropping them in that manner was shit. riqster Dec 2013 #15
The people in that story obviously knew each others boundaries. Are_grits_groceries Dec 2013 #16
No criticism implied, and I don't think it's an issue at all. riqster Dec 2013 #17
Durn. And here I was hoping it WAS sexual innuendo and I was going to learn something new. nt Buns_of_Fire Dec 2013 #7
thank you for the post... PCIntern Dec 2013 #11
He also told his wife that, for a favor, he deserved rough sex as a reward. knitter4democracy Dec 2013 #13
If ya marry 'em at 12 or 13, ya might even get 'em afore they mama teaches 'em how to wax 'em down. Zorra Dec 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some personal backstory o...»Reply #9