Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
34. I see a difference between a negotiated tax deal that is specific to one plant or business...
Wed Mar 14, 2012, 09:47 PM
Mar 2012

and across the board tax cuts for the wealthy. No new plant; no tax break. The same applies to accelerated depreciation - it has no value unless you invest in assets to depreciate.

As far as energy costs go, you couldn't be more wrong. Natural gas is currently selling for about $2.25 per MCF - cheaper than it's been in about 10 years and it might go even lower (As a point of reference, it sold for about $8.50 in 2008). Why? Fracking and directional drilling have opened up vast new reserves of natural gas and NGL's for production. At $2.25, it's cheaper than it is in many competing countries and thus attractive to companies that use lots of it. All of the projections I have seen are forecasting natural gas prices to stay low for the forseeable future.

The problem with your approach is that you have no revenue source to fund it. Where are you going to get the money to pay off the debt of the young people and families? Keep wages up? How? The law of supply and demand is working against you. As far as the US being the world's major market that is true, but we are not adding the value needed to sustain that. IMO, it's been largely sustained with debt in recent years and that is not sustainable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not that you will get an answer from the everyday dunderhed republican, but the reason is... liberal N proud Mar 2012 #1
I'm guessing most republicans will question the ratio. athenasatanjesus Mar 2012 #2
Republican friends?????????? bowens43 Mar 2012 #3
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #4
Excuse me? Most Democrats are hypocrites? Really? I don't think so at all. LiberalLoner Mar 2012 #8
You are wrong siligut Mar 2012 #12
He must be a troll hiding just below the radar. demosincebirth Mar 2012 #19
My first thought too siligut Mar 2012 #27
Say what? classof56 Mar 2012 #17
If they answered correctly they would say B Calm Mar 2012 #5
My guess is they'll tell you you're an idiot, since nobody makes a job unless it can make them money JHB Mar 2012 #6
What's idiotic about that? badtoworse Mar 2012 #13
Do you mean why would Republicans tell you it is idiotic? JHB Mar 2012 #18
My point is that the problem is not a shortage of capital badtoworse Mar 2012 #25
And what do you prescribe to make us more competitive and business friendly? JHB Mar 2012 #26
Here are some suggestions badtoworse Mar 2012 #30
In other words, cuts taxes on the wealthy, slash regulations, and lower wages starroute Mar 2012 #32
I see a difference between a negotiated tax deal that is specific to one plant or business... badtoworse Mar 2012 #34
More specifically, how would you encourage companies to accept the higher overhead... JHB Mar 2012 #40
The short answer is none the way the economy is structured badtoworse Mar 2012 #42
And how are they going to do that if they don't have jobs? JHB Mar 2012 #44
Your economic views are very RepubliCON-like. fasttense Mar 2012 #39
So let's hear your plan for SUSTAINABLE job growth. badtoworse Mar 2012 #41
Problem is that the "job creators" have learned it is easier to steal money than rhett o rick Mar 2012 #21
They first would need to get off faith economics nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #7
"How do you spell 'cat'?"? KamaAina Mar 2012 #9
George Carlin: Repukes say the rich need more money for incentive... joeybee12 Mar 2012 #10
one more question donnasgirl Mar 2012 #11
the greatest fear of the GOP is that Obama will succeed MACARD Mar 2012 #15
Because with the rising cost of gas, 99% of all the wealth in the U.S just doesn't go as far Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #14
They don't need more wealth. badtoworse Mar 2012 #16
Because they are greedy Smilo Mar 2012 #20
I question the accuracy of that statistic. subterranean Mar 2012 #22
I think you're relying on outdated data. Inequality has gotten a LOT worse in the last few years. SunSeeker Mar 2012 #37
I like this . . . but it's the Top TEN percent mistertrickster Mar 2012 #23
yah ONE percent and NINETY percent is only 91% stuntcat Mar 2012 #24
Won't stump anyone. WhatintheWorld Mar 2012 #28
Where in the world did YOU come from?And redwitch Mar 2012 #29
right,,,you've had the capital since reagan, so where are the american jobs? noiretextatique Mar 2012 #31
The top 1% owns MORE wealth than the BOTTOM 90% of Americans ErikJ Mar 2012 #33
another one- ask them if they can name anything important that limbaugh has been right about certainot Mar 2012 #35
Oh hell, they'd be stumped by "which is your left hand?" VPStoltz Mar 2012 #36
I don't thing I have the spiritual energy to continue to indulge their delusions. TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #38
The conservatives having been drinking supply side koolaide so long, they can't recognize Thor_MN Mar 2012 #43
I DO NOT have any republican friends just1voice Mar 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The One Question that wil...»Reply #34