Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Doctor who testified to keep brain-dead teen on ventilator is a religious quack. [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)65. There's a lot of doctors who aren't neurologists who agree with him.
You wouldn't trust a neurologist to diagnose and treat a problem in your pancreas. Likewise, you wouldn't trust a endocrinologist to diagnose and treat a problem in your brain.
You wouldn't trust a neurologist to monitor and treat any problems arising from a pregnancy. Likewise, you wouldn't trust an obstetrician to diagnose and treat a problem in your brain.
And so on.
Specialization means you don't know much beyond the general public outside your specialty. Your opinions outside your specialty should be treated with the same level of trust as the opinions of the general public, even though you have "Dr" in front of your name.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Doctor who testified to keep brain-dead teen on ventilator is a religious quack. [View all]
RandySF
Dec 2013
OP
Yes, he is, and just the type an exploitive lawyer-type would hire in a case like this.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2013
#1
But removal or trimming of the turbinate bones is the very last proceedure that should be used
intaglio
Dec 2013
#61
How would the parents know that? They obviously followed the advice of a respected doctor.
pnwmom
Dec 2013
#73
Uh.....what exactly is it about his background and experience that makes him a quack?
Th1onein
Dec 2013
#18
You're the one arguing that the guy isn't a crank. The evidence is clear that he is.
LeftyMom
Dec 2013
#45
He rejects science based on something Pope Ratzi said. He wants to keep corpses warm a little longer
LeftyMom
Dec 2013
#50
This guy has done extensive research on this topic. He doesn't reject science.
Th1onein
Dec 2013
#51
And, by the way, it's not good form to call your opponent in an argument a "moron."
Th1onein
Dec 2013
#41
There's absolutely no substantiation that anyone is making money off organ donation!
riderinthestorm
Dec 2013
#76
This is a very sad, tragic story. So please don't think I'm making light of it when I mention that
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#54
if bran-death is not death - then why is cardiac-death considered death?
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2013
#58
If this had been handled by the original doctors with a shred of respect, decency and care
ScreamingMeemie
Dec 2013
#72