Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If this is true (as presented), then shame on MSNBC (Updated) [View all]Dawson Leery
(19,570 posts)37. If MHP is suspend and/or fired, I will turn of MSNBC.
http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/16054-free-speech-phil-robertson-vs-melissa-harris-perry
"Regardless of my personal opinion, this is at least a defensible position. A person may or may not find something offensive, regardless of the objective fact that it offended others, and so not see the need for disciplinary action. Many instead invoked Robertsons free speech rights. This is an untenable position from any angle. No one was sanctioned by the government, so no rights were violated. However, A&E also has free speech rights, employer rights, and contract rights, which precious few conservatives stood up for at the time.
It became even more clear Monday how transparent some of these arguments were. On MSNBC, Melissa Harris Perry and her shows panel made fun of a family portrait of Mitt Romney and all his grandchildren, including an adopted infant who happens to be black. Twitter was set ablaze. Within hours, Fox News hosts were questioning her ongoing employment, and the RNCs Communications Director directly called for her suspension. Im guessing these people had a different opinion about Phil Robertsons situation. Previous examples of this disparate treatment include Martin Bashir and the Dixie Chicks."
"Regardless of my personal opinion, this is at least a defensible position. A person may or may not find something offensive, regardless of the objective fact that it offended others, and so not see the need for disciplinary action. Many instead invoked Robertsons free speech rights. This is an untenable position from any angle. No one was sanctioned by the government, so no rights were violated. However, A&E also has free speech rights, employer rights, and contract rights, which precious few conservatives stood up for at the time.
It became even more clear Monday how transparent some of these arguments were. On MSNBC, Melissa Harris Perry and her shows panel made fun of a family portrait of Mitt Romney and all his grandchildren, including an adopted infant who happens to be black. Twitter was set ablaze. Within hours, Fox News hosts were questioning her ongoing employment, and the RNCs Communications Director directly called for her suspension. Im guessing these people had a different opinion about Phil Robertsons situation. Previous examples of this disparate treatment include Martin Bashir and the Dixie Chicks."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I saw the segment. It wasn't malicious, but they shouldn't have gone there.
OmahaBlueDog
Dec 2013
#10
When the kids are placed front and center, they don't get a pass as political targets.
WowSeriously
Dec 2013
#26
and lots of rich white folks go out of their way to adopt children of different races
SoCalDem
Dec 2013
#20
They made a child the punchline of a meanspirited joke. You don't find that offensive?
WillowTree
Dec 2013
#21
Thanks. Your assessment seems to be the most correct one. AND MHP apologized nt
stevenleser
Dec 2013
#31
People do realize that MHP is African American and taught African American studies
Vashta Nerada
Dec 2013
#28