Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
12. Correction: those were before the Civil War.
Tue Dec 31, 2013, 02:52 PM
Dec 2013

Southerners invaded Cuba twice before the Civil War. Second time the Spanish killed one of every ten captives. After that they turned to attempts to purchase Cuba or convince the United States to conquer Cuba for them.

Also before the Civil War, they succeeded in conquering Baja California. They then used Baja as a base for invading Sonoma which resulted in them losing both Baja and Sonoma.

Then there was Guatemala. They assisted one side in a civil war. After the war they asked for all the Black citizens to be their slaves in payment. The new government refused prompting them to take control of the country themselves. When they stated rounding up Blacks and collaring them, all the neighboring countries rushed in to restore the original government. The southerners re-invaded Guatemala a second time. As with Cuba, they lost and large numbers of them were executed to put a stop to the invasions.


I believe the federal government only took two anti-slave positions prior to the Civil War: prohibited slavery in federal territories and partook in the African slave embargo. A breeding slave is not a working slave. A child slave is not a working slave. As such, most slave owners wanted nothing to do with breeding slaves.

Plus, the 3/5th rule meant the Masters received more political power if they had more slaves (for some odd reason today's liberals think it is "digusting" that Masters only received 60% more political power for each slave they owned). And, of course, the United States was growing and the slave economy needed more slaves to spread into the new states.

So the Norman/Celts were desperate for more slaves to counter the power of the Anglo-Saxons. And one way of getting more slaves was invading countries were they could be obtained.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The 124 states of America [View all] MindMover Dec 2013 OP
Thought maybe dipsydoodle Dec 2013 #1
Never would have guessed Illinois was so secessionist .... MindMover Dec 2013 #2
Not that bad jakeXT Dec 2013 #3
When did the US acquire Baja and Cuba? truebluegreen Dec 2013 #4
Around and after the civil war, there were various efforts by defeated southerners... Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #5
Ah! Thank you. truebluegreen Dec 2013 #6
Correction: those were before the Civil War. ieoeja Dec 2013 #12
Lmao @ chihuahua!! darkangel218 Dec 2013 #7
or forgottonia .... MindMover Dec 2013 #8
Wheres that one? darkangel218 Dec 2013 #9
Illinois ... MindMover Dec 2013 #10
Oh i see it, nevermind lmao!!! darkangel218 Dec 2013 #11
Sometimes I feel St. Louis would be better off as a city-state... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #13
omg, ... MindMover Dec 2013 #14
Not sure what your comment is directed at, if its the last sentence... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #15
A politicians wetdream about tax monies .... MindMover Dec 2013 #16
Actually, a merger of that sort would reduce some taxes for most people in the area... Humanist_Activist Dec 2013 #17
What state do you live in? SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 124 states of America»Reply #12