Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
1. ''Economic Darwinism'' is how we put it when Reaganomics first took off in 1981.
Tue Dec 31, 2013, 08:33 PM
Dec 2013

"Economic Survival of the Fittest" is what was meant. Then, too, few gave a damn what it meant for the poor and the Have-Nots. Now, 23 years later, it is getting obvious we are living in a nightmare economy for the vast majority, except for the Have-Mores.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

''Economic Darwinism'' is how we put it when Reaganomics first took off in 1981. Octafish Dec 2013 #1
I think you lost a decade somewhere. Seems more like 33 years to me. eom Blanks Dec 2013 #9
Sorry, my bad. Thanks for the correction. Octafish Jan 2014 #21
In nature, you're not the fittest because you start with more food and protection. Archaic Jan 2014 #16
Excellent analogy. Octafish Jan 2014 #22
Though we understand that what we rent now... MrMickeysMom Jan 2014 #23
They will start caring . . . Brigid Dec 2013 #2
But by then they will be convinced via propaganda that it's the fault of the left. nm rhett o rick Dec 2013 #8
It is a very sad commentary of what we (as a society) have become etherealtruth Dec 2013 #3
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times? Fumesucker Dec 2013 #10
Please sir, I want some more etherealtruth Dec 2013 #11
Agreed. I have a couple of family members with this mentality and its sick riderinthestorm Dec 2013 #4
Americans have, for the most part, become extremely self-centered. City Lights Dec 2013 #5
Why should they? The voice of opposition has been completely suppressed. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2013 #6
It's the new normal jsr Dec 2013 #7
So according to whom? 2naSalit Dec 2013 #12
How else do you explain 300 million people being taken advantage of by, at most, 12 million? jtuck004 Dec 2013 #13
But I don't see where you get 2naSalit Jan 2014 #17
How do you know they care? What behavior do they evince? I am guessing you don't presume to read jtuck004 Jan 2014 #18
So ranting 2naSalit Jan 2014 #19
Maybe if they cared you would have a job? But I'm glad your experience is so pleasant. jtuck004 Jan 2014 #20
Thanks for the 2naSalit Jan 2014 #24
So if we are going to change this, we have to get a window open in their minds - how... jtuck004 Dec 2013 #14
"The silence and complete lack of outrage over GOP monstrosities is just so disappointing" BumRushDaShow Dec 2013 #15
Until it happens to them and then "woe iz me". . . Paula Sims Jan 2014 #25
It's a long standing formula, but "dumbing down" can only be dumbed down so far... MrMickeysMom Jan 2014 #26
7% unemployment doesn't look so bad if you're among the 93% who are employed. stopbush Jan 2014 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #28
I care. 99Forever Jan 2014 #29
The "I've got mine and I don't care about you" faction of our society is a national disgrace. democratisphere Jan 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sad But True - Unemployme...»Reply #1