Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)

5. This presumes that the decision was based on her Catholicism

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Wed Jan 1, 2014, 04:57 PM

Jan 2014

and not her objective interpretation of the constitution.

It could very well be that she has legitimate constitutional questions even if I (we) don't agree.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Jan 2014 OP

Religious tests for government office are banned by the Constitution. former9thward Jan 2014 #1

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #2

Wow, just wow! hrmjustin Jan 2014 #3

Look at that. You and I agree again. last1standing Jan 2014 #8

Lol. well I knew we agreed on a few things. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #9

Well I don't like every SC decision... former9thward Jan 2014 #7

Maybe we could give him Thomas. last1standing Jan 2014 #10

Are you saying that there should be a change in qualifications that would include a religious test? cbayer Jan 2014 #12

Test for a 'stay' is a legal test. elleng Jan 2014 #4

This presumes that the decision was based on her Catholicism LittleBlue Jan 2014 #5

Would a couple of Southern Baptists make it better? last1standing Jan 2014 #6

No, diversity is not the issue. All Catholic, all Protestant, all....whatever. Who cares. It MATTERS WinkyDink Jan 2014 #11

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #13

I think that would be great but a religious test is not appropriate. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #14

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2014 #15