Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
1. This is a fairly common argument among Free Culture types
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:47 AM
Jan 2014

At least at first. Then they discover "balance" (the principle of balancing the rights of individual creators against the common benefit of culture - the initial and guiding principles of copyright and similar provisions).

Of course, the copyright people have also completely abandoned "balance", seeking to extend the copyright indefinitely into the future, and suing over previously fair uses of material (previously allowed because they benefit the commonwealth and culture more generally). So there ya go. Radicalism on one side generated radicalism on the other. Nothing wrong with that, either, as the transformation in media (from print/analog to digital) probably does require fairly serious rethinking of the legal/ethical principles, which were rooted, for better or worse, in the form (of media) that cultural creativity took.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a fairly common argument among Free Culture types alcibiades_mystery Jan 2014 #1
It does go back and forth; you are right there el_bryanto Jan 2014 #2
No doubt...if the same case was being made by a "Poor Remix Artists Collective" or some such alcibiades_mystery Jan 2014 #5
agree, when your as loaded as LeBouf, you haven't got much of an argument. Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #6
Indiana Jones 4 disqualifies LeBeouf from issuing statements regarding the nature of art Orrex Jan 2014 #3
Not everyone agrees that copyright is a good thing. bemildred Jan 2014 #4
If we live in a capitalist society you have to figure out a way to reward the artist for creating el_bryanto Jan 2014 #7
I like public funding for the arts myself. bemildred Jan 2014 #11
I think a mixed approach works best el_bryanto Jan 2014 #12
It's not (just) about retaining financial interest ... frazzled Jan 2014 #15
I understand the arguments quite well. bemildred Jan 2014 #18
Agreed; however ... frazzled Jan 2014 #22
In 20 years they are going to be able to animate Shia LeBeouf Johonny Jan 2014 #8
If I were the author of this plagiarized work, I'd hope LeBeouf does very well with this script. Romulox Jan 2014 #9
Yeah that's an example - that was a very odd situation. nt el_bryanto Jan 2014 #10
Shia has earned many millions from his involvment in heavily protected intellectual Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #13
+1 Tanuki Jan 2014 #17
Great point. Lex Jan 2014 #20
In the entertainment forums/blogs/groups JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #14
Someone needs to "repurpose" his short film mainer Jan 2014 #16
Not much different than anarchy, Libertarianism, soverign rule, and extreme property rights. Baitball Blogger Jan 2014 #19
So if you title yourself "artist" you can steal things wholesale? El_Johns Jan 2014 #21
What a little shithead... joeybee12 Jan 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Authorship is Censo...»Reply #1