Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
42. The short answer is none the way the economy is structured
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 08:25 AM
Mar 2012

Companies compete for investment capital and a company that did what you suggest would see lower returns and the value of their shares would plummet. The company might not even survive. Management has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders to protect and try to grow their investment, so they could not do what you suggest. You talk about companies as if they are separate and apart from the shareholders with discretion to ignore them. The shareholders OWN the company and it's up to them whether they want to accept lower returns or greater risk with their investment.

The environment we had three decades ago is gone forever and there is no way that anyone can bring it back. Look at what happened over the same period of time in the economies that have the jobs that used to be ours. They boomed. Why? They were willing and able to provide the same goods and services that we were at lower cost. We now operate in a global marketplace. The value of goods and services, and the labor needed to produce them is determined in the world market, not just the US and I don't know how to change that.

I look at where things are made and pay a premium for American made products when I can find them (which isn't very often.) A better approach might be to focus on getting consumers to demand more (higher quality?) American made products.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not that you will get an answer from the everyday dunderhed republican, but the reason is... liberal N proud Mar 2012 #1
I'm guessing most republicans will question the ratio. athenasatanjesus Mar 2012 #2
Republican friends?????????? bowens43 Mar 2012 #3
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #4
Excuse me? Most Democrats are hypocrites? Really? I don't think so at all. LiberalLoner Mar 2012 #8
You are wrong siligut Mar 2012 #12
He must be a troll hiding just below the radar. demosincebirth Mar 2012 #19
My first thought too siligut Mar 2012 #27
Say what? classof56 Mar 2012 #17
If they answered correctly they would say B Calm Mar 2012 #5
My guess is they'll tell you you're an idiot, since nobody makes a job unless it can make them money JHB Mar 2012 #6
What's idiotic about that? badtoworse Mar 2012 #13
Do you mean why would Republicans tell you it is idiotic? JHB Mar 2012 #18
My point is that the problem is not a shortage of capital badtoworse Mar 2012 #25
And what do you prescribe to make us more competitive and business friendly? JHB Mar 2012 #26
Here are some suggestions badtoworse Mar 2012 #30
In other words, cuts taxes on the wealthy, slash regulations, and lower wages starroute Mar 2012 #32
I see a difference between a negotiated tax deal that is specific to one plant or business... badtoworse Mar 2012 #34
More specifically, how would you encourage companies to accept the higher overhead... JHB Mar 2012 #40
The short answer is none the way the economy is structured badtoworse Mar 2012 #42
And how are they going to do that if they don't have jobs? JHB Mar 2012 #44
Your economic views are very RepubliCON-like. fasttense Mar 2012 #39
So let's hear your plan for SUSTAINABLE job growth. badtoworse Mar 2012 #41
Problem is that the "job creators" have learned it is easier to steal money than rhett o rick Mar 2012 #21
They first would need to get off faith economics nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #7
"How do you spell 'cat'?"? KamaAina Mar 2012 #9
George Carlin: Repukes say the rich need more money for incentive... joeybee12 Mar 2012 #10
one more question donnasgirl Mar 2012 #11
the greatest fear of the GOP is that Obama will succeed MACARD Mar 2012 #15
Because with the rising cost of gas, 99% of all the wealth in the U.S just doesn't go as far Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #14
They don't need more wealth. badtoworse Mar 2012 #16
Because they are greedy Smilo Mar 2012 #20
I question the accuracy of that statistic. subterranean Mar 2012 #22
I think you're relying on outdated data. Inequality has gotten a LOT worse in the last few years. SunSeeker Mar 2012 #37
I like this . . . but it's the Top TEN percent mistertrickster Mar 2012 #23
yah ONE percent and NINETY percent is only 91% stuntcat Mar 2012 #24
Won't stump anyone. WhatintheWorld Mar 2012 #28
Where in the world did YOU come from?And redwitch Mar 2012 #29
right,,,you've had the capital since reagan, so where are the american jobs? noiretextatique Mar 2012 #31
The top 1% owns MORE wealth than the BOTTOM 90% of Americans ErikJ Mar 2012 #33
another one- ask them if they can name anything important that limbaugh has been right about certainot Mar 2012 #35
Oh hell, they'd be stumped by "which is your left hand?" VPStoltz Mar 2012 #36
I don't thing I have the spiritual energy to continue to indulge their delusions. TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #38
The conservatives having been drinking supply side koolaide so long, they can't recognize Thor_MN Mar 2012 #43
I DO NOT have any republican friends just1voice Mar 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The One Question that wil...»Reply #42