Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Real Reason the Middle Class Is Dead [View all]blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)52. ,
,
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Growing up in Iowa, I remember my mother, a surgeon's wife, being outraged by what IBP was doing -.
SharonAnn
Jan 2014
#64
Yup...Divided we beg, united we negotiate -- Truer words were never spoken. n/t
whathehell
Jan 2014
#18
They forgot the part about where the meth comes from. I don't think it's accidental that
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#44
Republicans don't read anything that might open their minds. Open minds terrify them.
loudsue
Jan 2014
#41
So, you're saying there's no difference between Romney and Obama? Or between Bush and Gore?
baldguy
Jan 2014
#10
You got that right, pretty much the same as the out opposition with spell check.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#101
You said "Working folks have no option to vote for their interests". Your words.
baldguy
Jan 2014
#68
Whereas single payer was & is politically not viable with the current Congress and you know it.
baldguy
Jan 2014
#110
Note that *I'M* being accused of being a RW stooge in this thread for supporting the Pres & the Dems
baldguy
Jan 2014
#112
Trying to add qualifications to your offensive remarks doesn't make then any less offensive.
baldguy
Jan 2014
#100
I don't have to qualify, I didn't say the parties are the same. I said workers don't have an option
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#102
We're not talking about vegtables or rock albums, but about political parties & politicicians.
baldguy
Jan 2014
#103
republicans "more or less banned" immigration in 1921 and 1924; in 1965 Democrats reversed that.
pampango
Jan 2014
#12
The meatpacking unions were destroyed with illegal immigration. You're in denial. nt
Romulox
Jan 2014
#21
I am not in denial about the facts of immigration restrictions from 1925 to 1965 period in the OP.
pampango
Jan 2014
#25
Right. Now do the part about the total loss of a unionized industry (meatpacking) due to illegal
Romulox
Jan 2014
#26
I am not "defending" the use of illegal immigrants in the meat packing industry.
pampango
Jan 2014
#27
You were just denying it, remember? You defend via misdirection and misrepresentation.
Romulox
Jan 2014
#29
Are you lumping legal and illegal immigrants together? republicans "more or less banned" legal
pampango
Jan 2014
#33
I'm not wallowing in the mud with you, pampango. I'm also not allowing you to make demonstrably
Romulox
Jan 2014
#35
Legal immigration does not destroy the working class. If it did, republicans would be for it - not
pampango
Jan 2014
#39
You're attempting to twist my argument to your ends. It doesn't work. You said immigration doesn't
Romulox
Jan 2014
#40
Legal immigration does indeed bring down wages, and it's one of the reasons why bipartisan
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#118
Because people who scapegoat impoverished immigrants refuse to look at the whole picture.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#74
Where did I insinutate that everything was fine until the foreigners arrived?
truedelphi
Jan 2014
#107
I didn't say you made that argument yourself. But it's the argument of those who choose to blame
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#114
There have always been immigration quotas, but they have been very big leading to our
pampango
Jan 2014
#24
The truth of the matter is, that people are not paid according to their skills....
DrewFlorida
Jan 2014
#16
Yup. Skills had nothing to do with it. That's what some mill workers I know don't get. They think
brewens
Jan 2014
#17
That's an excellent point. Many have an overinflated idea of their market value - until reality hits
reformist2
Jan 2014
#123
The meatpacking unions were destroyed with illegal immigrants. As long as we have an open border
Romulox
Jan 2014
#19
No. The pertinent legislation requires legal status for employment. Our government ignores it. nt
Romulox
Jan 2014
#56
As did IBP. My union was screaming about this thirty years ago, no one else gave a shit.
Ikonoklast
Jan 2014
#71
I'm not saying there isn't a problem. But how do we deal with it without playing into right-wing
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#75
Except it's not professionals who've had to leave their home country or else starve.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#83
Except illegal immigration has slowed to a trickle, or even somewhat reversed itself, since the
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#97
Which is why we need better protections for all workers, including immigrants.
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#113
IBP located in Iowa, non-union, for starters. That was their first innovation, to locate outside
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#115
And what about all the Unionized plants IBP acquired? Tell me what happened there.
Ikonoklast
Jan 2014
#116
"Easily searched on the web" -- so is David Icke. Meatpacking wages were destroyed by
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#117
Fast Food Nation was another work that exposed the true impact of our corporate culture..
mountain grammy
Jan 2014
#32
No real issue with any of that. I'm more the Social Democrat type myself but I do sympathize
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#122
Most of what passes for 'employment' policy from the right (and many on the left)...
Wounded Bear
Jan 2014
#50