Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(85,276 posts)

3. A snack bar?

Fri Jan 3, 2014, 11:21 PM

Jan 2014

Where is this? That kind of food is prohibited at the SF Unified School District as well as our son's Catholic School.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senators: Are schools starving kids in the name of reducing lunch calories? [View all] RandySF Jan 2014 OP

Oh for pete's sake, they are hardly "starving"! femmocrat Jan 2014 #1

A snack bar? RandySF Jan 2014 #3

Pennsylvania. femmocrat Jan 2014 #6

And that's not a really old prohibition, I'm guessing. Igel Jan 2014 #13

Read the article...so what are the changes? flvegan Jan 2014 #2

I found a better article. RandySF Jan 2014 #4

Most of those senators are repukes and conservadems. femmocrat Jan 2014 #9

My reading is that it's lifting maximums, quite the opposite. NYC_SKP Jan 2014 #5

Kids are "starving," yet childhood obesity is at an all time high. 1000words Jan 2014 #7

We send snacks RandySF Jan 2014 #12

regulation in food service is necessary pipoman Jan 2014 #15

my pub;ic school son d_r Jan 2014 #16

OMG RandySF Jan 2014 #17

3:00 d_r Jan 2014 #18

When I visited the Bible Belt Le Taz Hot Jan 2014 #19