Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House announces two new 'executive actions' on guns [View all]HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)8. Not an executive order, but "statements", it's posted at the WH website here are
brief explanations included there:
Some states have noted that the terminology used by federal law to prohibit people from purchasing a firearm for certain mental health reasons is ambiguous. Today, DOJ is issuing a proposed rule to make several clarifications. For example, DOJ is proposing to clarify that the statutory term committed to a mental institution includes involuntary inpatient as well as outpatient commitments. In addition to providing general guidance on federal law, these clarifications will help states determine what information should be made accessible to the federal background check system, which will, in turn, strengthen the systems reliability and effectiveness.
Some states have also said that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Acts (HIPAA) privacy provisions may be preventing them from making relevant information available to the background check system regarding individuals prohibited from purchasing a firearm for mental health reasons. In April 2013, HHS began to identify the scope and extent of the problem, and based on public comments is now issuing a proposed rule to eliminate this barrier by giving certain HIPAA covered entities an express permission to submit to the background check system the limited information necessary to help keep guns out of potentially dangerous hands. The proposed rule will not change the fact that seeking help for mental health problems or getting treatment does not make someone legally prohibited from having a firearm. Furthermore, nothing in the proposed rule would require reporting on general mental health visits or other routine mental health care, or would exempt providers solely performing these treatment services from existing privacy rules.
--------------
For those not familiar with the term "outpatient commitment" apparently refers to mandated/involuntary treatment that allows the patient to live in the community rather than within an institution.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thanks. I agree. I've seen some charge $35, but even paying that is responsible thing to do.
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#53
And if the state governments really cared they wouldn't require you to go just to an FFL
Glassunion
Jan 2014
#67
That's good too. But, if the state doesn't, what do you think a so-called responsible gun owner
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#73
Gun fanciers have been a bit out there too. I think if one has a DUI, they should not be able
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#5
How many innocent folks get killed, wounded, intimidated by a shoplifter or jaywalker?
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#72
Apparently you are living in Wayne's World. It has gone exactly 180 degrees
madinmaryland
Jan 2014
#41
Not an executive order, but "statements", it's posted at the WH website here are
HereSince1628
Jan 2014
#8
Below is a link to the full White House fact sheet regarding the 'executive actions'
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#13
I know, you guys will find a way to rationalise taking the cash. Never had any doubt.
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#35
Details matter, Hoyt. Bloviating and hand-wringing don't actually *do* anything.
X_Digger
Jan 2014
#37
The only aspect of the problem that concerns you is how to protect your access to gunz and
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#39
I don't know that there is a national standard for outpatient commitment.
HereSince1628
Jan 2014
#16
Well, as long as there's an actual judicial hearing, with proper representation..
X_Digger
Jan 2014
#26
Hey gun fanciers use autos, flashlights, fire extinguishers, hammers, etc., to rationalize their
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#38
At least he's not trying to defend something that should be taboo in a civilized society - more
Hoyt
Jan 2014
#47
Well, I don't see this as a wider range of records, but more of the records that the law intended..
X_Digger
Jan 2014
#28