General Discussion

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)

13. Below is a link to the full White House fact sheet regarding the 'executive actions'

Fri Jan 3, 2014, 11:56 PM

Jan 2014

Here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/01/03/fact-sheet-strengthening-federal-background-check-system-keep-guns-out-p

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

White House announces two new 'executive actions' on guns [View all] aikoaiko Jan 2014 OP

k&r... spanone Jan 2014 #1

If gunners really cared, they would not transfer a gun without FFL involved. Hoyt Jan 2014 #2

You have quite the imagination there. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #18

I never do. Deep13 Jan 2014 #51

Thanks. I agree. I've seen some charge $35, but even paying that is responsible thing to do. Hoyt Jan 2014 #53

And if the state governments really cared they wouldn't require you to go just to an FFL Glassunion Jan 2014 #67

I like that Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #69

That's good too. But, if the state doesn't, what do you think a so-called responsible gun owner Hoyt Jan 2014 #73

I have a feeling that soon Chuuku Davis Jan 2014 #3

Yeah, exactly what I took from this.... dhill926 Jan 2014 #4

Gun fanciers have been a bit out there too. I think if one has a DUI, they should not be able Hoyt Jan 2014 #5

Good thought. They should be charged with madinmaryland Jan 2014 #36

And I suppose shoplifters should never be allowed to shop again seveneyes Jan 2014 #65

How many innocent folks get killed, wounded, intimidated by a shoplifter or jaywalker? Hoyt Jan 2014 #72

I think being determined to be PARANOID might be a better reason. JoePhilly Jan 2014 #10

Oh sure, tip of the iceburg. Skip Intro Jan 2014 #17

bull & shit. spanone Jan 2014 #21

Apparently you are living in Wayne's World. It has gone exactly 180 degrees madinmaryland Jan 2014 #41

And gun owners have been a little whiny in the last 25 years. MyNameGoesHere Jan 2014 #50

little whiny Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #58

Exactly! Just like you showed and example of. MyNameGoesHere Jan 2014 #66

In California, a bill passed the Legislature that would have given a 10 year petronius Jan 2014 #62

"militant anti-gunners" nuff said. You guys are all out tonight. madinmaryland Jan 2014 #6

Yup 1000words Jan 2014 #32

I'd like more detail X_Digger Jan 2014 #7

Not an executive order, but "statements", it's posted at the WH website here are HereSince1628 Jan 2014 #8

Ahh, thanks for the text! X_Digger Jan 2014 #9

Below is a link to the full White House fact sheet regarding the 'executive actions' Tx4obama Jan 2014 #13

Well, that's only mildly more explanatory.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #20

Found more info, links below Tx4obama Jan 2014 #27

Ahh, so a change to USC 922. That clarifies a lot. X_Digger Jan 2014 #29

Grade A post! TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author Skip Intro Jan 2014 #42

Would you sell one of your guns to someone with a serious mental condition? Hoyt Jan 2014 #14

The issue isn't really the presence of a 'serious mental condition' HereSince1628 Jan 2014 #19

I don't think I've ever met a gun fancier capable of making that determination. Hoyt Jan 2014 #34

I would never knowingly sell to a prohibited person. X_Digger Jan 2014 #24

I know, you guys will find a way to rationalise taking the cash. Never had any doubt. Hoyt Jan 2014 #35

Details matter, Hoyt. Bloviating and hand-wringing don't actually *do* anything. X_Digger Jan 2014 #37

The only aspect of the problem that concerns you is how to protect your access to gunz and Hoyt Jan 2014 #39

^ Perfect example. Thanks for making my point for me. n/t X_Digger Jan 2014 #40

^^^^ Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #74

I don't know that there is a national standard for outpatient commitment. HereSince1628 Jan 2014 #16

Well, as long as there's an actual judicial hearing, with proper representation.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #26

Some who value individual rights and libeties don't like it either. Skip Intro Jan 2014 #11

See the link in Comment #13 Tx4obama Jan 2014 #15

Worse than I thought. Skip Intro Jan 2014 #30

Also see links in Comment #27 Tx4obama Jan 2014 #31

And even worse. n/t Skip Intro Jan 2014 #44

Skip, I think you may be reading more into it than is intended.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #43

I think you may be reading less into it as intended Skip Intro Jan 2014 #49

I'll await the final language for the proposed rule change, to be sure. n/t X_Digger Jan 2014 #56

Here's the proposed text.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #64

Great news. Get ready, gunners! FEMA camps by 2015! Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jan 2014 #46

" culture war against gun owners" bowens43 Jan 2014 #22

Ah, so now you've sunk to equating gun owners with cancer. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #25

Hey gun fanciers use autos, flashlights, fire extinguishers, hammers, etc., to rationalize their Hoyt Jan 2014 #38

Oh, I get his "point" all right. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #45

At least he's not trying to defend something that should be taboo in a civilized society - more Hoyt Jan 2014 #47

I didn't really expect anything better than a "tu quoque" fallacy. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #48

Keep it up Hoyt, Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #54

Nah, best spokespersons are militia types, preepies, bigots, white wing, Hoyt Jan 2014 #59

You're a riot. Ranchemp. Jan 2014 #61

These are sensible steps. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #23

Well, I don't see this as a wider range of records, but more of the records that the law intended.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #28

Honestly, I'm not so keen on mental health providers turning over confidential... Deep13 Jan 2014 #52

Most murders are not committed by crazy people. gwheezie Jan 2014 #55

lot of word salad Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #57

Oh NOES! 99Forever Jan 2014 #60

'Obama's comin' to git arr gunzzz!!!' onehandle Jan 2014 #63

Actually, a good discussion, here. Something you can't abide. nt Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #68

You notice that Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #70

I've long contended gun-control is an elitist outlook. DU proves it... Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #75

Won't this require a change to the HIPPA law? Calista241 Jan 2014 #71

There's a "culture war" against gun owners? Blue_Tires Jan 2014 #76