Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sendero

(28,552 posts)

19. How many boom-bust cycles does it take..

Reply to CountAllVotes (Reply #8)

Sat Jan 4, 2014, 01:43 PM

Jan 2014

... for anyone with an IQ above dirt to see it is rigged? The next big crash can't be far away, and of course it will be blamed on the FEDs monetary policy. But the fact is that anything that rises 20% a year for several years IS GOING TO CRASH.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama may be best economic president ever for Stock Market [View all] Quixote1818 Jan 2014 OP

Dems should NEVER cite the stock market as evidence of good economic conditions, except ironically. reformist2 Jan 2014 #1

Except it's a major part of public pension funds frazzled Jan 2014 #6

Like in Detroit. Octafish Jan 2014 #11

Word, so easy for people to ignore the corporate tyranny Rex Jan 2014 #35

Yes but.. sendero Jan 2014 #14

So when the stock market crashes, that should not matter either? treestar Jan 2014 #23

"Someone told us Wall Street fell, but we were so poor that we couldn't tell." reformist2 Jan 2014 #25

So if the market crashes whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #26

Different hypothetical treestar Jan 2014 #28

Not true whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #29

For rich people, yes... Mass Jan 2014 #2

This OP is a joke, right? last1standing Jan 2014 #3

+1 CountAllVotes Jan 2014 #5

+1 and tone deaf in the bargain. winter is coming Jan 2014 #12

It amounts to little more than bad propaganda. last1standing Jan 2014 #13

People.. sendero Jan 2014 #16

Read the whole article Quixote1818 Jan 2014 #24

No one here is arguing that Democrats are better for the economy in general... last1standing Jan 2014 #30

I agree the title is misleading Quixote1818 Jan 2014 #31

This is the kind of context that would have helped your OP. last1standing Jan 2014 #32

Obama admits 95% of income gains gone to top 1% marsis Jan 2014 #33

This economy is doing me no good at all CountAllVotes Jan 2014 #4

The biggest problem with the stock market today is that it has led to a disconnect. last1standing Jan 2014 #7

The stock market CountAllVotes Jan 2014 #8

Of course it's rigged. last1standing Jan 2014 #10

How many boom-bust cycles does it take.. sendero Jan 2014 #19

The biggest part of the game now is luring in pension & 401K funds for periodic fleecing. reformist2 Jan 2014 #21

LOL cherokeeprogressive Jan 2014 #9

But only for rich people n/t eridani Jan 2014 #15

The chocolate ration has been INCREASED. woo me with science Jan 2014 #17

nice try. KG Jan 2014 #18

You don't want to be giving Obama credit for the Bernanke Bubble DesMoinesDem Jan 2014 #20

Democrats are always better for the economy treestar Jan 2014 #22

Very misguiding, the Stock Market is a metric for the 1% whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #27

Stocks were going to go up anyway ...and Rmoney knew it too. L0oniX Jan 2014 #34