Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

questionseverything

(11,642 posts)
7. dehaven smith said it was in the over votes
Sat Jan 4, 2014, 01:31 PM
Jan 2014

LdHS: It’s an embarrassing outcome for George Bush because it showed that Gore had gotten more votes. Everybody had thought that the chads were where all the bad ballots were, but it turned out that the ones that were the most decisive were write-in ballots where people would check Gore and write Gore in, and the machine kicked those out. There were 175,000 votes overall that were so-called “spoiled ballots.” About two-thirds of the spoiled ballots were over-votes; many or most of them would have been write-in over-votes, where people had punched and written in a candidate’s name. And nobody looked at this, not even the Florida Supreme Court in the last decision it made requiring a statewide recount. Nobody had thought about it except Judge Terry Lewis, who was overseeing the statewide recount when it was halted by the U.S. Supreme Court. The write-in over-votes have really not gotten much attention. Those votes are not ambiguous. When you see Gore picked and then Gore written in, there’s not a question in your mind who this person was voting for. When you go through those, they’re unambiguous: Bush got some of those votes, but they were overwhelmingly for Gore. For example, in an analysis of the 2.7 million votes that had been cast in Florida’s eight largest counties, The Washington Post found that Gore’s name was punched on 46,000 of the over-vote ballots it, while Bush’s name was marked on only 17,000.

RinR: For your research, you merged this set of data with detailed profiles of Florida’s electoral precincts. What did you find?

LdHS: One of the things I found that hadn’t been reported anywhere is, if you look at where those votes occurred, they were in predominantly black precincts. And (when you look at) the history of black voting in Florida, these are people that have been disenfranchised, intimidated. In the history of the early 20th century, black votes would be thrown out on technicalities, like they would use an X instead of a check mark.
So you can understand why African Americans would be so careful, checking off Gore’s name on the list of candidates and also writing Gore’s name in the space for write-in votes. But because of the way the vote-counting machines work, this had the opposite effect: the machines threw out their ballots.

http://rinr.fsu.edu/winter2005/features/battlefield.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes - we would be smart to remember who the real enemy is... polichick Jan 2014 #1
You're correct. It is the smarter thing to do. But in a country where first impressions BlueCaliDem Jan 2014 #3
What? You think we're not going to have a republican president for decades? loudsue Jan 2014 #67
Yep. BlueCaliDem Jan 2014 #70
Well, only time will tell. n/t loudsue Jan 2014 #71
FWIW... BlueCaliDem Jan 2014 #73
Wow yeoman6987 Jan 2014 #6
The post is in the context of recent discussions on the board. MADem Jan 2014 #9
Your comment shows how much - or little - you get... polichick Jan 2014 #10
That's the whole point in a nutshell. We are being screwed six ways to Sunday loudsue Jan 2014 #72
Yes Kath1 Jan 2014 #53
Time for some DU babies mstinamotorcity2 Jan 2014 #89
True that. If the entire state had been recounted, which it later was, Gore won. Zen Democrat Jan 2014 #2
dehaven smith said it was in the over votes questionseverything Jan 2014 #7
Wow. :( LukeFL Jan 2014 #26
not dead but ailing questionseverything Jan 2014 #34
Gore -LIEBERMAN won elehhhhna Jan 2014 #4
Gore Won Big. Octafish Jan 2014 #5
so did kerry questionseverything Jan 2014 #14
Absolutely. Too bad Connell died so suddenly in that small airplane. Octafish Jan 2014 #16
How is Rove still walking free? malaise Jan 2014 #19
The Powers To Be love Rove. He is very useful. I heard that he was caught rhett o rick Jan 2014 #44
the election integrity peops asked for his protection questionseverything Jan 2014 #20
And that election was the only time ever that the Supreme Court chose the winner. pacalo Jan 2014 #43
Were it not for that shitty injustice, none of us would be here. MADem Jan 2014 #8
Yeah, I ran into Nader recently DFW Jan 2014 #12
They were friends - both of Lebanese origin malaise Jan 2014 #21
I knew Helen for 50 years DFW Jan 2014 #32
Your relationship with Helen is well known malaise Jan 2014 #66
Helen was a love. She gave a lot of us hope during the dark Dubya years! nt MADem Jan 2014 #40
We knew her for fifty years DFW Jan 2014 #42
I remember when you first posted that picture, and told a few tales-not out of school, of course- MADem Jan 2014 #47
Are you trying to diffuse the petty bickering that is currently ongoing elsewhere on DU? Or, ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2014 #11
The robbing of the USA of a Gore Presidency DFW Jan 2014 #13
When I think of the biggest tragedy that came from the Bush presidency... Blanks Jan 2014 #15
You are so correct re Sandra Day O'Connor No Vested Interest Jan 2014 #17
+1 Dawson Leery Jan 2014 #29
I concur: we're not going to survive in present form for more than another couple of decades. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #30
I recall being in utter disbelief that our system could become so corrupt. Now I just take it for adirondacker Jan 2014 #50
Precisely malaise Jan 2014 #18
You can BET 9/11 wouldn't have happened.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #22
AND, he almost lost because HE WAS NOT PROGRESSIVE ENOUGH, not the reverse. grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #23
Sad K&R. Overseas Jan 2014 #24
Meh, they very same people that cry over Nader and have a selective memory Rex Jan 2014 #25
No, they're not. They were people who voted Democratic in local elections, pnwmom Jan 2014 #38
I think Nader is an asshole, and I have never once voted for a Republican--and I couldn't MADem Jan 2014 #41
Nope, those 100,000 folks are Panhandle Democrats who always vote Republican in state wide and stevenleser Jan 2014 #56
I don't understand Nader supporters constantly bringing up 100,000 Dixiecrats who voted for Shrub Hippo_Tron Jan 2014 #57
They think those 100,000 allow them to blame Democrats for the election theft instead of Nader stevenleser Jan 2014 #60
2001-2009 was an usurpation rustbeltvoice Jan 2014 #27
i know samsingh Jan 2014 #28
I guess that means VP LIEberscum won, too. blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #31
it was openly admitted by Newsweek August 2001 MisterP Jan 2014 #33
Been saying that for years n/t Gore1FL Jan 2014 #35
Like me, you are one of the early members of this site, Art_from_Ark Jan 2014 #62
But Nader helped put BUSH into the office. That's the bottom line. n/t pnwmom Jan 2014 #36
thats the company line reddread Jan 2014 #49
Nader ran hard in Florida, taking more than 90,000 votes in a race pnwmom Jan 2014 #54
"Single progressive who had the greatest influence on throwing the election to Bush" Hippo_Tron Jan 2014 #59
I assume you meant to write that Nader took more than 90,000 votes, which strengthens your point. Jim Lane Jan 2014 #61
Thank you, you are absolutely right. If only one in a hundred Nader voters pnwmom Jan 2014 #63
magnitudes off reddread Jan 2014 #76
It never would have gotten to the 5 if Nader hadn't drawn over 90,000 votes. pnwmom Jan 2014 #77
as if reddread Jan 2014 #79
Jeb and Katherine would have been caught if they'd cheated on that scale. pnwmom Jan 2014 #80
if you say so, assertions are not evidence reddread Jan 2014 #81
Nader ran in some key swing states where a handful of Rethugs pnwmom Jan 2014 #82
so the simple math logic requires is more of a gift than i thought reddread Jan 2014 #83
The Rethugs couldn't fix more ballots because the disparity would have required pnwmom Jan 2014 #87
beliefs are odd reddread Jan 2014 #88
Paul Wellstone backing the CBC petition would've changed absolutely nothing Hippo_Tron Jan 2014 #58
Bush stole it and did not win reddread Jan 2014 #75
Overturning Florida's electoral votes would've required a Republican controlled House... Hippo_Tron Jan 2014 #78
challenging the results of theft would be enough reddread Jan 2014 #85
are you suggesting reddread Jan 2014 #86
GORE WON bonzaga Jan 2014 #84
Yes he did. Damnit. And so did Kerry. Mira Jan 2014 #37
American Coup 2000 colsohlibgal Jan 2014 #39
What DOES matter is that Bush became President. That meaning of who "won" is important. Jim Lane Jan 2014 #45
Nader--have intellectual honesty? Not only was his 2004 campaign paid for by the GOP, he has MADem Jan 2014 #48
Good grief I never saw that. Thanks for posting it. n/t freshwest Mar 2014 #90
Of course he did lpbk2713 Jan 2014 #46
Yes he did sakabatou Jan 2014 #51
Am I the only one who heard a report on 9-11 Iris Jan 2014 #52
I remember that. 2naSalit Jan 2014 #55
He's still President-Elect to me. byronius Jan 2014 #64
They did not steal the election with good intentions in mind. Enthusiast Jan 2014 #65
DU's Raison d'etre JCMach1 Jan 2014 #68
Recommend #80 H2O Man Jan 2014 #69
Republicons lied and stole the election from America Berlum Jan 2014 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think it deserves it's ...»Reply #7