Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I think it deserves it's own thread: Gore won the election [View all]reddread
(6,896 posts)75. Bush stole it and did not win
Nader didnt steal it, the Democratic members of the Senate rolled over for the kingpins of organized crimes.
then proceeded to use Nader as much or more than any Republicans ever did.
this charade is beyond belief.
Whatever happened to accountability?
Scapegoating voters and marginal candidates while
a nonstop string of crimes against humanity proceeded, and Nader never cast a vote in favor.
Cant say the same for the top tier DLC Gods of those who put party first these days.
America the ugly will never regain its position, and both parties are equally at fault.
People who cant deal with the barefaced treason and point fingers at scapegoats
aint helping a thing.
some of you deserve exactly what you got.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're correct. It is the smarter thing to do. But in a country where first impressions
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2014
#3
True that. If the entire state had been recounted, which it later was, Gore won.
Zen Democrat
Jan 2014
#2
And that election was the only time ever that the Supreme Court chose the winner.
pacalo
Jan 2014
#43
I remember when you first posted that picture, and told a few tales-not out of school, of course-
MADem
Jan 2014
#47
Are you trying to diffuse the petty bickering that is currently ongoing elsewhere on DU? Or,
ChisolmTrailDem
Jan 2014
#11
I concur: we're not going to survive in present form for more than another couple of decades.
Lizzie Poppet
Jan 2014
#30
I recall being in utter disbelief that our system could become so corrupt. Now I just take it for
adirondacker
Jan 2014
#50
AND, he almost lost because HE WAS NOT PROGRESSIVE ENOUGH, not the reverse.
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#23
I think Nader is an asshole, and I have never once voted for a Republican--and I couldn't
MADem
Jan 2014
#41
Nope, those 100,000 folks are Panhandle Democrats who always vote Republican in state wide and
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#56
I don't understand Nader supporters constantly bringing up 100,000 Dixiecrats who voted for Shrub
Hippo_Tron
Jan 2014
#57
They think those 100,000 allow them to blame Democrats for the election theft instead of Nader
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#60
"Single progressive who had the greatest influence on throwing the election to Bush"
Hippo_Tron
Jan 2014
#59
I assume you meant to write that Nader took more than 90,000 votes, which strengthens your point.
Jim Lane
Jan 2014
#61
Overturning Florida's electoral votes would've required a Republican controlled House...
Hippo_Tron
Jan 2014
#78
What DOES matter is that Bush became President. That meaning of who "won" is important.
Jim Lane
Jan 2014
#45