Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

last1standing

(11,709 posts)
61. LOL! All you've got is writing like a sixth grader on Reddit.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 12:22 AM
Jan 2014

I don't think it's me whose mad, bro. Your hero can't seem to figure out how the proper talking point to send you guys to smear Greenwald with. That's gotta hurt deep down.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This paints with a broad brush, Snowden was not enriched when Greenwald sold those secrets. Vincardog Jan 2014 #1
I don't think it says Snowden was enriched; I think it says he wasn't, in fact. El_Johns Jan 2014 #2
The inference is there: Vincardog Jan 2014 #18
What this hit piece does is try to confuse the weak minded into believing Greenwald shouldn't profit last1standing Jan 2014 #19
Agreed. Apples to Grapes comparison. Vincardog Jan 2014 #20
oh, I didn't know they ran to China and Russia with the goods in hand... Whisp Jan 2014 #47
Looks like you don't know the difference between a journalist and a whistleblower, either. last1standing Jan 2014 #48
I don't have to be 'told' anything. Whisp Jan 2014 #49
^^^ This! ^^^ BlueCaliDem Jan 2014 #55
Hammer meet Nail! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #57
Haha! What a performance. last1standing Jan 2014 #62
He is a libertarian of the R Paul stinkin type, he stole and he ran to Russia, Whisp Jan 2014 #68
Snowden turned nothing over to the Chinese or Russians blackspade Jan 2014 #51
he also said he can hack into the Presidents email and phone... Whisp Jan 2014 #52
LOL! blackspade Jan 2014 #54
Who owned the secrets disovered by Watergate and the Pentagon Papers? last1standing Jan 2014 #3
You know, I can read all the Pentagon Papers. Can you read all the NSA documents Snowden claims msanthrope Jan 2014 #5
So you want them all published? I agree. Let's get them all out there. last1standing Jan 2014 #8
All published, after identifiers that could harm people are taken out. msanthrope Jan 2014 #16
Is that necessary in order to stop NSA abuses? last1standing Jan 2014 #21
It's necessary to prevent this situation from popping up again..... msanthrope Jan 2014 #25
What does the opinion you linked have to do with what we're talking about? last1standing Jan 2014 #28
Something more important than Greenwald and Snowden---people's lives. If the NSA information msanthrope Jan 2014 #29
Please tell me you're joking. last1standing Jan 2014 #31
Okay--you are a bit all over the place. The comparison was between Ellsberg/Pentagon Papers and msanthrope Jan 2014 #33
I'll get working on that children's book. last1standing Jan 2014 #34
First, kindly tell us about the trove of documents Mark Felt stole???? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #36
You want us to believe Felt made up the Watergate scandal? last1standing Jan 2014 #38
Tell us all how the head of COINTELPRO 'leaked' FBI documents to Naval Intelligence. msanthrope Jan 2014 #40
I think the article makes it very clear how that case was different from this one. Ellsberg leaked El_Johns Jan 2014 #7
Snowden offered the documents to more than Greenwald. They chose not to take him up on it. last1standing Jan 2014 #10
I don't think you read the article. Its focus is Greenwald, not Snowden. It doesn't claim El_Johns Jan 2014 #11
Did Woodward and Bernstein give away the info they got from Deepthroat or profit from it? last1standing Jan 2014 #12
I'll wait for you to actually read the article. No point responding until you have. El_Johns Jan 2014 #13
I've read it. It's an insulting smear piece that doesn't answer my question. Neither have you. last1standing Jan 2014 #15
Your comments don't indicate it. El_Johns Jan 2014 #24
Um.. Have you read the article? My comments directly contradict it. last1standing Jan 2014 #26
Assange has also sometimes sought to privatize his leaks struggle4progress Jan 2014 #4
Imagine.. "a victim of his own methods".. Cha Jan 2014 #43
Considering the risks and startup costs, He'll be lucky to break even Demeter Jan 2014 #6
As more and more stories emerge and there will be many more, saying these leaks are to Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #9
Does this guy really want Snowden's NSA package spread around more? bemildred Jan 2014 #14
They belong to We The People and the NSA should hand them over to us. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #17
Glenn Greenwald Responds to the "Pando post" - and other matters KoKo Jan 2014 #22
Great piece Oilwellian Jan 2014 #27
Funny--I can read the Pentagon papers for free. Why can't I do that with the NSA ones? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #30
Could you read all the info from the Watergate scandal before the Post printed it? last1standing Jan 2014 #32
I think you miss the comparison made---in both the Pentagon Papers and the NSA debacle, there's msanthrope Jan 2014 #35
Felt leaked secret FBI documents. How is this different? last1standing Jan 2014 #37
To whom? FYI, do you really believe that the head of COINTELPRO 'leaked' anything to msanthrope Jan 2014 #39
When facts disrupt what you want to believe you merely reject them. last1standing Jan 2014 #42
Seriously--where is this treasure trove of super-secret FBI documents that Felt leaked? msanthrope Jan 2014 #44
Now just hold on jmowreader Jan 2014 #23
Excellent article. Whisp Jan 2014 #41
Indeed.. is Snowden the patsy? Cha Jan 2014 #45
You keep selling but nobody's buying. last1standing Jan 2014 #46
u mad not everyone likes douchewald bro. dionysus Jan 2014 #53
.. yes, they mad.. Cha Jan 2014 #56
They're good & pissed at Sibel Edmonds as well. She's asking some interesting.... Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #58
don't you make light of bebe jeebus glen like that! those are fightin woids!111! time for kickboxin! dionysus Jan 2014 #60
LOL! All you've got is writing like a sixth grader on Reddit. last1standing Jan 2014 #61
no, not really. i recognize bitter flailing when i see it. dionysus Jan 2014 #63
And you still can't stop yourself? Must be a compulsion of some sort. last1standing Jan 2014 #64
yes, as a matter of fact i do. we've concluded the people i argue on DU with are nuts. dionysus Jan 2014 #65
So they're at the stage where they placate you? Nice. last1standing Jan 2014 #66
What a bullshit article blackspade Jan 2014 #50
Wonder what the purchase is to be used for .... fadedrose Jan 2014 #59
Greenwald's cravenness is revealing but not the least surprising. ucrdem Jan 2014 #67
Greenwald is a slimeball. Whisp Jan 2014 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Keeping Secrets: Pierre O...»Reply #61