Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ElboRuum

(4,717 posts)
89. By any realistic definition...
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 01:42 AM
Jan 2014

...a studied medical practice that has a palpable, non-trivial therapeutic value cannot be considered woo by any reasonable person.

Those DUers who have made this claim ought to temper their reflexive and overwrought skepticism and accept the idea that science has peered into this box and found something useful.

That said, though, is that this whole flap on DU of late seems to spring forth directly from the other side of the issue, the peddling of actual woo. The umbrella of 'alternative medicine' as understood by some DUers shelters some serious woo and irrational mistrust of science. Some of those vested within that framework of ideas take umbrage to being classified as such.

Then some poo was flung. The rest is history.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A. C. Clarke summed it up nicely.... mike_c Jan 2014 #1
Except woo =/= magic. ElboRuum Jan 2014 #8
Many people here think acupuncture is woo pnwmom Jan 2014 #78
If true... ElboRuum Jan 2014 #80
I agree that acupuncture is not woo, even though many DUers pnwmom Jan 2014 #82
By any realistic definition... ElboRuum Jan 2014 #89
I'm sure you're familiar with this poster. This is a typical offering. pnwmom Jan 2014 #104
statistical significance studies are woo Vattel Jan 2014 #219
^== This. IdaBriggs Jan 2014 #42
lol! Matariki Jan 2014 #43
No, really. It's aliens. ElboRuum Jan 2014 #65
Your talking about conventional wisdom before it's excepted . orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #2
Accepted, not excepted. darkangel218 Jan 2014 #4
Either works... defacto7 Jan 2014 #71
Thanks orpupilofnature57 Jan 2014 #162
Actually, they're opposites. jazzimov Jan 2014 #207
Correct! defacto7 Jan 2014 #211
Your your from yore is you're. TeeYiYi Jan 2014 #169
You are absolutely correct, WillyT. darkangel218 Jan 2014 #3
Yep... Now That They Have The Knowledge Produced By The Imaginations And Works Of Others... WillyT Jan 2014 #105
It's really weird, isn't it? bananas Jan 2014 #231
Well... Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #5
You have figured out that it doesnt work??? darkangel218 Jan 2014 #7
And this is why it is woo Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #10
Yes, there is zero possibility whatchamacallit Jan 2014 #168
You do realize homeopathy is water right? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #171
If by natural compounds you mean water. TransitJohn Jan 2014 #175
homoeopathy: water has selective memory. It doesn't remember piss or shit but remembers arnica. idwiyo Jan 2014 #111
It has worked for me and others while Science doesn't have a very 'happy' history either. Remember sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #18
No... homeopathy did not work for you Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #23
And this is why your argument loses credibility. IdaBriggs Jan 2014 #44
Sorry... It is a simple fact that homeopathy does not cure anything Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #48
Sigh. Dude, did it EVER occur to you that there MIGHT IdaBriggs Jan 2014 #59
Homeopathy is water, nothing more. Take a quick look at what it is before defending it Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #61
I just had a delicious glass of homeopathy ElboRuum Jan 2014 #92
The last few days I had some GI distress MattBaggins Jan 2014 #177
I have premature twins. They were born at 32 weeks. IdaBriggs Jan 2014 #203
This has nothing to do with whether someone is lying or not... Silent3 Jan 2014 #199
Disclaimer: I know nothing about homeopathy. IdaBriggs Jan 2014 #200
Actually, that's a rational response. Marr Jan 2014 #138
An anecdote isn't data. eom TransitJohn Jan 2014 #176
Tell that to the reporters. IdaBriggs Jan 2014 #185
Oh please Ohio Joe Tumbulu Jan 2014 #46
Do you know what homeopathy is? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #51
My water does MyNameGoesHere Jan 2014 #58
Oh please Joe, yes I do Tumbulu Jan 2014 #64
I'm sorry but I don't think you do know what it is Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #74
Of course I know what they say it is Tumbulu Jan 2014 #99
No. I can not MattBaggins Jan 2014 #178
+1...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #184
Oh you, internet poster has the nerve to insult vets Tumbulu Jan 2014 #188
One of dearest principles as a liberal MattBaggins Jan 2014 #192
Well oh knowledgeable sage of the Tumbulu Jan 2014 #195
You just listed a bunch of medical procedures MattBaggins Jan 2014 #196
My vet uses acupuncture when it will help Tumbulu Jan 2014 #197
You should look for a new vet MattBaggins Jan 2014 #202
You should not advise me about vets Tumbulu Jan 2014 #214
Really? MattBaggins Jan 2014 #215
Lol. My husband's a nationally recognized competitor in dressage and combined training riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #220
Accupuncture is pure and utter bunk MattBaggins Jan 2014 #222
Lol. Like I give a shit what you think. Results or not riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #225
FYI, the veterinary textbooks and writings have been *INVALUABLE* IdaBriggs Jan 2014 #206
We se a doggie psychiatrist and it works for us! zappaman Jan 2014 #210
homeopathy works by providing information to the immune system Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #93
... SidDithers Jan 2014 #95
you underestimate life itself. Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #101
And you don't understand dilution...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #103
I do. We simply have a different perspective. Voice for Peace Jan 2014 #106
Tell me you're joking. /nt Marr Jan 2014 #140
What a massive load of BS MattBaggins Jan 2014 #179
It's pretty good for curing mild dehydration. Marr Jan 2014 #139
...and wikipedia is your source? Sancho Jan 2014 #180
From your link: "treating the individual with highly diluted substances" Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #183
check some of the references…. Sancho Jan 2014 #186
"Some" Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #187
In the late 1800's, "some" MD's at Dartmouth Medical school thought that smoking caused cancer!! Sancho Jan 2014 #190
It is not 'difficult' to detect... It's water Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #191
The effects of processing with water are hard to detect... Sancho Jan 2014 #193
It is not hard to detect... It is a "memory"... More commonly known as only water Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #194
...you aren't getting the point... Sancho Jan 2014 #198
Complete non-sense Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #201
Clearly you don't get the point then... Sancho Jan 2014 #204
Yes... And science is simply refusing to acknowledge this miracle Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #205
no...science has detected but not explained the "miracle"...you should read some chemistry articles. Sancho Jan 2014 #208
Yeah... Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #209
Ok...you simply don't get the logic... Sancho Jan 2014 #212
All that pesky science stuff still in your way? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #213
Wow, you really don't get it... Sancho Jan 2014 #216
"even if there's not a clear "scientific" reason" Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #218
If you have questions about the content of any of these... Sancho Jan 2014 #221
Right... Not going to post it Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #223
Because I think the science group isn't interested in continuing to debate with you... Sancho Jan 2014 #224
You think the Science Group would believe this non-sense? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #226
A thread that says "Ohio Joe is wrong" is not a topic for the science group... Sancho Jan 2014 #227
How about a thread that says "The science behind Homeopathy"? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #228
I'm not defending the practice of homeopathy - you're the one who introduced it!!! Sancho Jan 2014 #229
uh huh... Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #230
You can post references but...I'm waiting for your apology.... Sancho Jan 2014 #232
There's piles of stuff to keep you up for a few nights, it's not "just water"!! Sancho Jan 2014 #217
i think you may be confusing holistic with homeopathic...fyi. dionysus Jan 2014 #160
No I most definitely am not! nt Tumbulu Jan 2014 #166
ok, so you really believe water with miniscule traces of whatever work? dionysus Jan 2014 #167
I have posted repeatedly Tumbulu Jan 2014 #170
Homeopathy cured my thirst... SidDithers Jan 2014 #86
James Randi used to drink / eat homeopathic remedies as a stunt. joshcryer Jan 2014 #127
No homeopathy discussion is complete without Mitchell and Webb... SidDithers Jan 2014 #158
Indeed, homeopathy is insane. joshcryer Jan 2014 #126
Homeopathy works for me in preventing poison ivy. indie9197 Jan 2014 #73
No. It did not. Homeopathy is water and nothing more Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #75
It is near impossible Saviolo Jan 2014 #81
I subscribe to the Daily Atheism twitter feed... Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #145
Ooh Saviolo Jan 2014 #146
It's here Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #147
Woo = Snake Oil ElboRuum Jan 2014 #6
Really ??? WillyT Jan 2014 #14
Legality has nothing to do with scientific validity eallen Jan 2014 #15
Not My Point... My Point Was That Is You Go Back In Time... WillyT Jan 2014 #21
Again, acceptance is not the measure of woo. jeff47 Jan 2014 #25
So What You're Saying... Is That If A Hypothesis Is Tested And Found Wanting... It Becomes Woo... WillyT Jan 2014 #28
No. It becomes woo when it's tested, found false, and it's still being pushed as true. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2014 #30
Well, Now You're Talking Politics... Climate Change Anyone ??? WillyT Jan 2014 #33
Except those aren't woo. jeff47 Jan 2014 #35
BUT... They Didn't START That Way... Case In Point: WillyT Jan 2014 #45
Again, lack of acceptance is not woo. jeff47 Jan 2014 #50
Sorry WillyT, I don't get the point of the quote. defacto7 Jan 2014 #76
And There Ya Have It Folks !!! - Einstein Was Pro Woo... WillyT Jan 2014 #79
No, WillyT defacto7 Jan 2014 #142
Woo woo credo #36... SidDithers Jan 2014 #88
while the extent to which woo believers are doubling down surpises me a little... dionysus Jan 2014 #156
I'm amazed at the extent to which is has patrons here... SidDithers Jan 2014 #157
you're just closed minded Sid. after a few weeks with those crystals, you'll be singing a different dionysus Jan 2014 #159
"Woo is fraud." Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #66
No. ElboRuum Jan 2014 #77
Therefore... If It Were Not For Edward Snowden... All Talk About What The NSA Is/Is Not Doing... WillyT Jan 2014 #83
Read more, whaaargarbllle less. ElboRuum Jan 2014 #90
So When Todd Aikin Suggests That Women's Body's Can Shut Down Pregnancy From Rape... WillyT Jan 2014 #94
That's not politics, that's a dumbass politician making a medical claim... SidDithers Jan 2014 #96
I'm Hear To Learn... You Know That Sid... Just Asking Questions... WillyT Jan 2014 #98
*here ElboRuum Jan 2014 #102
"Oh Death... Where Is Thy Sting ???" - Missed A Misspelling... WillyT Jan 2014 #107
This message was self-deleted by its author ElboRuum Jan 2014 #118
Yes, that, and a point... ElboRuum Jan 2014 #119
Thank You... I'm Very Amused... WillyT Jan 2014 #120
No. ElboRuum Jan 2014 #100
People here call anything "woo" that might fly in the face of the DC Villagers view of the world. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #114
Ah, if you're going to broad brush... ElboRuum Jan 2014 #116
Thanks for the fine example of what I was talking about. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #121
Hey, if you're going to attack... ElboRuum Jan 2014 #122
Where was there an "attack"? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #124
Ok... here... ElboRuum Jan 2014 #128
No. I claim there are people who panic that will hurt "The Cause" if you deviate from dogma. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #130
What cause is that? ElboRuum Jan 2014 #141
It's obvious. Victory of the "D"s over the "R"s even if you have to become an "R" to get it. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #148
So what about this is woo? ElboRuum Jan 2014 #32
Thalidimide, DES = Tragic Scientific Woo. See the settlements to the victims of your 'infallible sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #19
It may have been tragic, but it was not 'woo'. ElboRuum Jan 2014 #38
It was actually LACK of proper scientific testing that caused these tragedies LeftishBrit Jan 2014 #174
Anti-woo crowd on DU Ms. Toad Jan 2014 #22
Good post! n/t KT2000 Jan 2014 #37
Ah, yes, because "anti-woo crowd" is "productive discussion" ElboRuum Jan 2014 #57
Not defensive, at all. Ms. Toad Jan 2014 #110
Unfortunately, I can't agree with this... ElboRuum Jan 2014 #115
You are proving my point - Ms. Toad Jan 2014 #125
You claimed that the anti-woo predilection for pointing out this was a strawman. ElboRuum Jan 2014 #136
Yep. pretty much. nt laundry_queen Jan 2014 #108
What got us to the moon? It wasn't fairies and acupuncture. X_Digger Jan 2014 #9
Except For Hundreds And Thousands Of Years, Manned Flight Was A "Fancy"... WillyT Jan 2014 #54
No, those who claimed we would never fly, because "god didn't give man wings".. were spouting woo. X_Digger Jan 2014 #55
And That's Why I Asked The Question In The OP... WillyT Jan 2014 #60
And the same would apply to 2naSalit Jan 2014 #63
Thing is, the 'test and repeat' have been done for things like acupuncture.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #67
And I don't know where your 2naSalit Jan 2014 #69
You might want to re-read your own previous post. X_Digger Jan 2014 #72
Doesn't "woo" derive from an echoic replication of old sci-fi Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #131
Yes, you're misunderstanding Spider Jerusalem Jan 2014 #11
First they ignore you..... Th1onein Jan 2014 #12
"But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at SidDithers Jan 2014 #91
This is why I hate the word "woo". It's over-applied. arcane1 Jan 2014 #13
The difference is easy Scootaloo Jan 2014 #16
Except that is not how it is being used on DU. Ms. Toad Jan 2014 #24
That is EXACTLY how it's being used. Scootaloo Jan 2014 #34
^^THIS^^ longship Jan 2014 #39
I'm not distinguishing it Ms. Toad Jan 2014 #40
You do understand you just linked to survey results Scootaloo Jan 2014 #135
So anything other than AMA KT2000 Jan 2014 #49
^^^ this. nt laundry_queen Jan 2014 #112
And you're illustrating my point Scootaloo Jan 2014 #133
ridiculous KT2000 Jan 2014 #134
absurd Scootaloo Jan 2014 #137
Talking about cures before a germ theory *was* woo, in fact Recursion Jan 2014 #17
Lead still cannot be converted into gold Art_from_Ark Jan 2014 #47
Teach the controversy! Recursion Jan 2014 #53
Nice try Art_from_Ark Jan 2014 #113
Technically, transmutation is possible, it take a LOT of energy, and a particle... Humanist_Activist Jan 2014 #117
No, I mean Pb nuclei have been made to decay into Au Recursion Jan 2014 #123
You can turn Mercury (Hg-196 specifically) into gold. joshcryer Jan 2014 #129
And all those things submitted to rigorous testing, brought to you by... DRoseDARs Jan 2014 #20
no, the way those things happened was by not being woo. JVS Jan 2014 #26
Dammit, stop all this talk about the earth moving around the sun, Gallileo! It's all WOO! Squinch Jan 2014 #27
LOL !!! WillyT Jan 2014 #29
Very much so! Squinch Jan 2014 #150
It wasn't science that silenced Galileo,it was religion. sufrommich Jan 2014 #152
At the time, conventional science and religion were the same thing. And everyone who believed in Squinch Jan 2014 #153
Which is why Galileo is the poster boy sufrommich Jan 2014 #154
That is one way to look at it. Another is that he is the poster boy for what happens Squinch Jan 2014 #155
No. Deep13 Jan 2014 #31
I'm so over the woo-flinger group arikara Jan 2014 #36
It's not "woo" vs. "science", it's "Scientific Method" vs. "Unrestrained Capitalism/Profit Motive". yodermon Jan 2014 #41
No. gcomeau Jan 2014 #52
What about the flat earth? Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #56
This is a BIG TOPIC, but I'll give it a shot... cthulu2016 Jan 2014 #62
+1 JVS Jan 2014 #172
Manned flight, landing on the moon, chemistry, geology, etc apply science Gore1FL Jan 2014 #68
We had a one-post trollie troll in the "antibiotic" thread last month LadyHawkAZ Jan 2014 #70
Yes, you're misunderstanding woo...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #84
no. woo is not a hypothesis or an experiment La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2014 #85
Bingo. Deep13 Jan 2014 #143
brilliantly said. nt La Lioness Priyanka Jan 2014 #144
Most of what has been considered bunk, remains bunk. We simply remember the rare successes most. Silent3 Jan 2014 #87
We didn't have the means to investigate some of those fields NuclearDem Jan 2014 #97
No way. Woo is woo, no too do. Coyotl Jan 2014 #109
I have a serious question for supporters of woo. Marr Jan 2014 #132
Why go back that far? Do you as a supporter of science advocate the 20th Century Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #164
Science moves on when something proves ineffective. Marr Jan 2014 #165
This is why Carl Sagan's The Demon Haunted World should sufrommich Jan 2014 #149
No, there was not such a time. gcomeau Jan 2014 #151
Dreaming of flying to the moon with ballistic rockets & space suits isn't woo. baldguy Jan 2014 #161
We'd already gone to the moon when 'Scientific Research' still claimed being gay was Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #163
Hell, there are some that are still claiming homosexuality is a disease justiceischeap Jan 2014 #181
I may be wrong myself, but I don't think that futuristic speculation is what's generally called woo LeftishBrit Jan 2014 #173
I think it's all in what the definition of woo is to a specific person justiceischeap Jan 2014 #182
Yes, you are misunderstanding woo. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #189
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe I'm Misunderstandin...»Reply #89