Is the Official 9/11 story Woo? because the 'investigation' wasn't based on science

[geek tragedy]

23. "tiny fire"

another example of the conspiracy woo crowd just making shit up in order to support their false religion.

After the North tower fell, its debris ignited several large, out of control fires in several different locations in WTC.

And, people who actually know stuff did a report on this:

In November 2008, NIST released its final report on the causes of the collapse of 7 World Trade Center.[13] This followed NIST's August 21, 2008, draft report which included a period for public comments.[40] In its investigation, NIST utilized ANSYS to model events leading up to collapse initiation and LS-DYNA models to simulate the global response to the initiating events.[49] NIST determined that diesel fuel did not play an important role, nor did the structural damage from the collapse of the Twin Towers, nor did the transfer elements (trusses, girders, and cantilever overhangs). But the lack of water to fight the fire was an important factor. The fires burned out of control during the afternoon, causing floor beams near column 79 to expand and push a key girder off its seat, triggering the floors to fail around column 79 on Floors 8 to 14. With a loss of lateral support across nine floors, column 79 buckled – pulling the east penthouse and nearby columns down with it. With the buckling of these critical columns, the collapse then progressed east-to-west across the core, ultimately overloading the perimeter support, which buckled between Floors 7 and 17, causing the remaining portion of the building above to fall downward as a single unit. The fires, fueled by office contents, along with the lack of water, were the key reasons for the collapse.[13]

But, some guy on the Internet with a youtube page says differently, so the scientists must be lying.