Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JustAnotherGen

(38,057 posts)
23. In total agreement
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 02:50 PM
Jan 2014

My husband is a small business owner who has consistently grown in this economy.

Last master welder with an artistic background/training came from Michigan after being unemployed for three years. He had more than 400 resumes.

His HVAC business - every.single.job opening they are bombarded.

Me? I work at HQ at a major telecom.

For both of us -

Put one skilled laborer to work on Public Works Project - Preferably Green Based. They spend money. The places they spend money spend money (b2b). This creates a tax paying employee, who spends more money. And so on and so forth.

Very very simplified - but if a backhoe driver makes enough money to pay a tax preparer, then the tax preparer has enough money to pay for that green energy item for her home, the green energy employee has enough money to pay for a new patent with an attorney, that attorney now has more money for a new paralegal, the paralegal decides to buy a new car . . . he buys the new car from the sales woman at the Fiat dealership, etc. etc.


Other two things - tax me. No seriously. What is this problem people have taxing us> I wrote it this weekend and yet again - tax our two person family at a serious rate - not a joke rate. Oh - and keep taxing me on everything I earn for SS. Then give our seniors a raise - So our seniors can spend money they aren't spending now.


It's simple - to make money you have to spend money. So tax me at a rate that we can spend money, so people can earn money, so they can spend money, and so on and so forth.

Maybe it's my telecom marketing (product management, product launch, etc. etc.) and more than 15 years in a smoke in mirrors business - but it seems so simple. One more thing . . . my husband is a juried artist - who figured out how to make a living 'metal art' that is what he is and is doing more and more every day - hence hiring master welders to create his designs for homes/business/buildings or do the physical restoration work so he can focus on sculpting.


Eventually all the money will trickle up to the VERY rich who buy his artowrk and the whole system just keeps things circulating and going.


Not giving you a hard time - but I see the difference $40 an hour can make to a man with 15 years experience who just needed a shot. I've seen what starting at $18 an hour as a level one welder can do for a young black woman who grew up in Camden but some guy from Italy moved here, started a business, gave her a shot at learning a skill and just 5 years later . . . she is hanging (earlier today) from a church in Belgium at twice the hourly rate restoring the 4 year old iron work around stained glass.


It works.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When this Congress JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #1
Some government work programs would be good, but we shouldn't make jobs for the sake of making jobs. reformist2 Jan 2014 #9
Why is it better to get nothing in return... Lost_Count Jan 2014 #12
Amen JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #17
I'd go the next step... Lost_Count Jan 2014 #19
In total agreement JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #23
I'm not talking about jobs for the sake of jobs JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #16
The people BobUp Jan 2014 #2
Actually it is the employer who pays, amount depends somewhat on the number of claims Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #3
The retraining/go back to school thingee is just another sham/scam when it comes to finding work. stopbush Jan 2014 #5
In the State of Texas the employer only pays on the first $9000 and to the Federal it is the Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #15
The employer pays into the unemployment fund, not the employee. We agree on that. But I don't politicaljunkie41910 Jan 2014 #29
You're overlooking the mandate from the government that employers pay into UI. stopbush Jan 2014 #32
Actually I'm an accountant so I understand how the process works. politicaljunkie41910 Jan 2014 #33
The company pays for uninsurance taxes, not the employee MiniMe Jan 2014 #4
See my post #5 stopbush Jan 2014 #6
That's why employers will fight unemployment claims madville Jan 2014 #11
Extended unemployment ought to be "permanentized" into basic income, a human right. reformist2 Jan 2014 #7
You know, I really think that would make the country a much better place. LisaLynne Jan 2014 #8
Indeed. My favorite part of the basic income is that it gives the would-be worker bargaining power. reformist2 Jan 2014 #10
LOL snooper2 Jan 2014 #14
Tough call. Somewhere above subsistence but below the median, obviously. reformist2 Jan 2014 #21
My take on it: The Straight Story Jan 2014 #13
Companies who fire/lay off a lot of workers already pay more into UI funds stopbush Jan 2014 #31
Link it to some state-wide average unemployment rate. After a base time limit. randome Jan 2014 #18
Are there no prisons? Are there no work houses? They should die and decrease the... Drew Richards Jan 2014 #20
Should be indexed to unemployment and participation rates. TheKentuckian Jan 2014 #22
I would agree... kentuck Jan 2014 #25
The programs udbcrzy2 Jan 2014 #24
When the economy for the middle class is fixed? uponit7771 Jan 2014 #26
The UI program MissMillie Jan 2014 #27
I only collected unemployment benifits only once ($30) and at the time you could only collect for demosincebirth Jan 2014 #28
When we drop Social Security access to age 55 and 401K/Pension access to 50. haele Jan 2014 #30
When the unemployment rate reaches a level considered satisfactory, ProgressSaves Jan 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So Where Do We Draw The L...»Reply #23