Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Science is the reason we live so well in the 21st century. Woo is what held it back for so long [View all]Vattel
(9,289 posts)38. Your post is woo by your own definition.
You claim that "Woo is making a claim without backing of research done through the scientific method (proper testing and observation, peer review, independent study)." But you make this claim without the backing of research done through the scientific method (proper testing and observation, peer review, independent study). Thus, by your own definition of woo, your claim is woo.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Science is the reason we live so well in the 21st century. Woo is what held it back for so long [View all]
Pretzel_Warrior
Jan 2014
OP
And they have held civilization back too. This whole Woo thing is total nonsense
Katashi_itto
Jan 2014
#18
If vitamin supplements are but one element of the domain "woo," why do doctors prescribe
JDPriestly
Jan 2014
#19
Copernicus' ideas were considered "woo" at the time, by conventional thinkers of the day.
Electric Monk
Jan 2014
#3
you mean the conventional pope who wanted to kill him if he dared say the earth wasn't
Pretzel_Warrior
Jan 2014
#5
Is it that different than "conventional medicine" orgs like the AMA vs Chiropractors?
Electric Monk
Jan 2014
#6
Thank you, that's a very good way to put it. They (OP et al) are framing it backwards. nt
Electric Monk
Jan 2014
#12
no, I actually don't. scientific method will observe and accept or reject various hypotheses
Pretzel_Warrior
Jan 2014
#13
"Postmodernism is shit, and it has no clothes." - Want to talk about par for the course.
Gravitycollapse
Jan 2014
#22
Christianity fucked us over and continues to do so by labeling science as woo.
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#15
toilet paper is the height of civilisation, especially the real soft stuff. thank you science.
loli phabay
Jan 2014
#36