Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
38. Your post is woo by your own definition.
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 04:05 PM
Jan 2014

You claim that "Woo is making a claim without backing of research done through the scientific method (proper testing and observation, peer review, independent study)." But you make this claim without the backing of research done through the scientific method (proper testing and observation, peer review, independent study). Thus, by your own definition of woo, your claim is woo.

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Precisely. "Magical thinking." Lizzie Poppet Jan 2014 #1
So vitamin supplements were the cause for holding civilization back. ok. Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #2
"vitamin supplements" are but one element of the domain "woo" Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #4
And they have held civilization back too. This whole Woo thing is total nonsense Katashi_itto Jan 2014 #18
If vitamin supplements are but one element of the domain "woo," why do doctors prescribe JDPriestly Jan 2014 #19
Copernicus' ideas were considered "woo" at the time, by conventional thinkers of the day. Electric Monk Jan 2014 #3
you mean the conventional pope who wanted to kill him if he dared say the earth wasn't Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #5
Is it that different than "conventional medicine" orgs like the AMA vs Chiropractors? Electric Monk Jan 2014 #6
show me your scientific data then. Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #7
By his or her logic, ProgressSaves Jan 2014 #9
At 2 in the morning on a Sunday night? Google it yourself, lol. Electric Monk Jan 2014 #11
Science adjusts its beliefs based on what's observed. ProgressSaves Jan 2014 #8
Intelligent design was at one point held to high academic esteem. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #10
Thank you, that's a very good way to put it. They (OP et al) are framing it backwards. nt Electric Monk Jan 2014 #12
The OP is a pretzel. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #16
no, I actually don't. scientific method will observe and accept or reject various hypotheses Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #13
You're failing to ask epistemic questions. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #14
Postmodernist nonsense Confusious Jan 2014 #17
Actually, gravity is very much a mystery Drahthaardogs Jan 2014 #21
"Postmodernism is shit, and it has no clothes." - Want to talk about par for the course. Gravitycollapse Jan 2014 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Jan 2014 #27
Christianity fucked us over and continues to do so by labeling science as woo. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #15
Better living through chemistry. BlueToTheBone Jan 2014 #20
toilet paper is the height of civilisation, especially the real soft stuff. thank you science. loli phabay Jan 2014 #36
The older the tree, the softer on your tush. n/t BlueToTheBone Jan 2014 #40
i thought it was the bushier the bush. loli phabay Jan 2014 #41
When JFK talked of putting a man on the moon... NCTraveler Jan 2014 #23
There's a difference between thinking something is too hard to do... Humanist_Activist Jan 2014 #24
Woo has gone so far here, at this point its use has been broadened. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #25
I do kind of agree with you. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #30
No, no, no. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #26
Three no's, that's big time. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #28
No! A thousand times no! NuclearDem Jan 2014 #32
Love it. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #33
Your post is woo by your own definition. Vattel Jan 2014 #38
Bad! Bad! NuclearDem Jan 2014 #39
True, but... Capt. Obvious Jan 2014 #29
Get back to us on this ohheckyeah Jan 2014 #31
lawdy, lawdy Puzzledtraveller Jan 2014 #34
Just don't confuse skepticism as woo. Glassunion Jan 2014 #35
Fossil fuels are the reason we lived so well in the 20th century. bemildred Jan 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Science is the reason we ...»Reply #38