Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
24. Not Really... But...
Mon Jan 6, 2014, 05:06 PM
Jan 2014
World War II and the Manhattan Project

In 1939, a group of Hungarian scientists that included emigre physicist Leó Szilárd attempted to alert Washington of ongoing Nazi atomic bomb research. The group's warnings were discounted.[69] Einstein and Szilárd, along with other refugees such as Edward Teller and Eugene Wigner, "regarded it as their responsibility to alert Americans to the possibility that German scientists might win the race to build an atomic bomb, and to warn that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon."[57]:630[70] On July 12, 1939, a few months before the beginning of World War II in Europe, Szilárd and Wigner visited Einstein[71] and they explained the possibility of atomic bombs, to which pacifist Einstein replied: Daran habe ich gar nicht gedacht (I had not thought of that).[72] Einstein was persuaded to lend his prestige by writing a letter with Szilárd to President Franklin D. Roosevelt to alert him of the possibility. The letter also recommended that the U.S. government pay attention to and become directly involved in uranium research and associated chain reaction research.

The letter is believed to be "arguably the key stimulus for the U.S. adoption of serious investigations into nuclear weapons on the eve of the U.S. entry into World War II".[73] In addition to the letter, Einstein used his connections with the Belgian Royal Family[74] and the Belgian queen mother[69] to get access with a personal envoy to the White House's Oval Office.[69] President Roosevelt could not take the risk of allowing Hitler to possess atomic bombs first. As a result of Einstein's letter and his meetings with Roosevelt, the U.S. entered the "race" to develop the bomb, drawing on its "immense material, financial, and scientific resources" to initiate the Manhattan Project. It became the only country to successfully develop an atomic bomb during World War II.

For Einstein, "war was a disease ... [and] he called for resistance to war." By signing the letter to Roosevelt he went against his pacifist principles.[75] In 1954, a year before his death, Einstein said to his old friend, Linus Pauling, "I made one great mistake in my life — when I signed the letter to President Roosevelt recommending that atom bombs be made; but there was some justification — the danger that the Germans would make them ..."


Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Travels_abroad


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He resigned from the Prussian Academy of Science in 1933 after Hitler came to power jakeXT Jan 2014 #1
and he was Jewish. NYtoBush-Drop Dead Jan 2014 #18
If imagination > knowledge, is then, religion > science? Festivito Jan 2014 #2
No. Logical fallacies are run-of-the-mill here, just like what you wrote. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jan 2014 #4
How is it a fallacy? Festivito Jan 2014 #5
No. Scientific imagination is more powerful than religious "knowledge". Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #9
But yes for religious imagination over scientific knowledge then? Festivito Jan 2014 #11
No, and no to your disruptive red herring. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #15
Immagination is the source of greater knowledge(NT) The Wizard Jan 2014 #27
Yes, imagination too. That was the point of Einstein's quote. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #31
disruptive?? demwing Jan 2014 #28
Religion is disruptive. It doesn't appreciate being questioned. It has nothing to do with the OP. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #30
Science is rational demwing Jan 2014 #39
I think the post boils down to the idea that religion has nothing to do with imagination. Festivito Jan 2014 #42
No. It boils down to the OP has nothing to do with religion. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #47
You're misstating the actual concept Orrex Jan 2014 #12
The "actual concept" is what Einstein stated. And it was the OP that stated that, not me. Festivito Jan 2014 #14
If you think Einstein meant religion>science, then show your source Orrex Jan 2014 #17
I posed it as a question, not as a fact. Festivito Jan 2014 #37
Well, that's disingenuous of you Orrex Jan 2014 #38
Wrong. I like the OP quote. eom. Festivito Jan 2014 #44
No. You miss the concept by missing the boat. You bring the real smoke screen. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #19
The most imaginative religion never cured anything ... GeorgeGist Jan 2014 #34
Tell that to Pasteur. n/t Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #41
No. You tell us how Pasteur relates to religion curing anything (which it does not). nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #49
If you're waiting for some description of Pasteur's religion Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #50
Every bit of motivation from religion for "healers" can be done without religion. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #55
Are you concerned that religion engenders bigotry and tribalism? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #56
Yes, and many other nasty things. Of course it is not the only source but is a huge source. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #58
If you don't like bigotry and tribalism then don't be a source of them. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2014 #59
Festivito introduced religion into this discussion, needlessly. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #60
Religion has to do with belief. truedelphi Jan 2014 #13
.. and what that belief, that faith can do for imagination. Festivito Jan 2014 #22
No. Imagination most usefully works by going outside of beliefs & old backgrounds. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #32
When 2+2=5, can faith in math be relative? eom. Festivito Jan 2014 #45
That post is nonsensical. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2014 #46
Einsteins theory of relativity is flawed. He realized it. Festivito Jan 2014 #48
I hope I'll always know when to walk away. hunter Jan 2014 #3
He left because of Hitler and Progressive dog Jan 2014 #6
He Was In The U.S. And Did Not Return Because Of Hitler, But He Was Repulsed At The Glee He Saw... WillyT Jan 2014 #7
You had him leaving in WW1, you do know that Progressive dog Jan 2014 #8
I May Have Got The Timeline Screwed Up (Remembering From A Great Documentary On Him, But... WillyT Jan 2014 #10
So shouldn't you edit your OP? muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #29
Was it the woo wars? Kaleva Jan 2014 #16
so it had nothing to do with Hitler getting power and him being Jewish ? JI7 Jan 2014 #20
See Post #10... WillyT Jan 2014 #23
didn't Einstein support the US developing weapons ? JI7 Jan 2014 #21
Not Really... But... WillyT Jan 2014 #24
so in the midst of WWII he was supportive of it an understood the threat JI7 Jan 2014 #25
I'm afraid I think this is completely wrong in just about all particulars Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2014 #26
LOL !!! WillyT Jan 2014 #33
About Einstein: truedelphi Jan 2014 #35
Touche, I admit. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2014 #36
because he was a Jew? nt arely staircase Jan 2014 #40
He was owed beer and travel expenses. Yet they did not want to pay up. Glassunion Jan 2014 #43
I miss RandomThoughts' word salads. LAGC Jan 2014 #53
You can't solve problems without a new model. Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2014 #51
this caused an enormous crisis of conscience in the US scientific world after Trinity and WWII MisterP Jan 2014 #52
So he left due to the development of more efficient killing machines... Omnith Jan 2014 #54
I really can't imagine why a Jew might have chosen to leave Berlin in 1933.... LeftishBrit Jan 2014 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Timely Repost: Do You K...»Reply #24