Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Democrats finally broke the filibuster on judicial nominees, and what does this President do? . . . [View all]
. . . Why, he outsources the selection of five judicial vacancies on the federal bench in Georgia to Republicans, of course, like any other President would do! Oh, wait . . .
FFS! God forbid this President should actually use an advantage Congressional Democrats handed to him!
[font size=4]Democratic Members Of Congress Slam Obama For Massive Cave To Republicans On Judges[/font]
BY IAN MILLHISER JANUARY 6, 2014 AT 3:53 PM
Last November, Senate Democrats invoked a procedural maneuver that allowed them to confirm judicial nominees by a simple majority vote, thus cutting off the GOPs ability to maintain control over a key federal appeals court by simply refusing to permit anyone to be confirmed. So its a bit odd that, just over a month after Senate Republicans effectively lost their ability to veto nominees from the minority. President Obama decided to outsource selecting nominees to most of the open judicial seats in Georgia to two Republican senators.
Presently, five judicial vacancies need to be filled in Georgia. Yet, 2013 wound down, Obama agreed to a deal that would place most of these seats in Republican hands. As we explained in September when this deal was under consideration,
Now that Obama has formally nominated this Republican slate of judges, his usual allies in Georgias congressional delegation are not happy. Shortly after the nominees were announced, civil rights legend Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) warned that these nominees do not adequately reflect the diversity of the northern district and that the selection process lacked meaningful community input, and that several nominees include persons who have advocated in favor of Georgias voter ID laws and for including the Confederate Battle Emblem as part of the Georgia State Flag. He was joined in his complaint about these nominees by several of his fellow civil rights leaders, as well as Reps. Hank Johnson (D-GA) and David Scott (D-GA).
< . . . . >
BY IAN MILLHISER JANUARY 6, 2014 AT 3:53 PM
Last November, Senate Democrats invoked a procedural maneuver that allowed them to confirm judicial nominees by a simple majority vote, thus cutting off the GOPs ability to maintain control over a key federal appeals court by simply refusing to permit anyone to be confirmed. So its a bit odd that, just over a month after Senate Republicans effectively lost their ability to veto nominees from the minority. President Obama decided to outsource selecting nominees to most of the open judicial seats in Georgia to two Republican senators.
Presently, five judicial vacancies need to be filled in Georgia. Yet, 2013 wound down, Obama agreed to a deal that would place most of these seats in Republican hands. As we explained in September when this deal was under consideration,
Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) and Johnny Isakson (R-GA) would agree to stop blocking attorney Jill Pryors nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit a nomination that they have effectively held up for well over 1000 days. In return, Obama would nominate a George H.W. Bush-appointed judge Chief Judge Julie Carnes of the Northern District of Georgia to the other open seat on the Eleventh Circuit, creating a fourth vacancy on this federal trial court. Chambliss and Isakson would then be allowed to select three of the four attorneys named to these seats.
Now that Obama has formally nominated this Republican slate of judges, his usual allies in Georgias congressional delegation are not happy. Shortly after the nominees were announced, civil rights legend Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) warned that these nominees do not adequately reflect the diversity of the northern district and that the selection process lacked meaningful community input, and that several nominees include persons who have advocated in favor of Georgias voter ID laws and for including the Confederate Battle Emblem as part of the Georgia State Flag. He was joined in his complaint about these nominees by several of his fellow civil rights leaders, as well as Reps. Hank Johnson (D-GA) and David Scott (D-GA).
< . . . . >
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats finally broke the filibuster on judicial nominees, and what does this President do? . . . [View all]
markpkessinger
Jan 2014
OP
Google blue slip process. It's still a part of how the senate does business. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#17
So what you're saying is we may as well vote for Republicans? If appointing Republicans is the 'way
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#40
Seems like some folks do not understand how the process of nominating 'District Court' nominees...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#57
As I posted in another thread someone started trying to trash Obama for this>>>
KittyWampus
Jan 2014
#3
It is at the 'Senate Judiciary Committee' level of the process when some Senators refuse to ...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#64
he is completely entitled to voice his displeasure. It's understandable. Doesn't change reality.
KittyWampus
Jan 2014
#58
So it's pointless to elect Democrats then? I remember the urging to 'vote even for Blue Dogs
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#42
See Comment #47 re 'District Court' nominees - they're picked differently than Appeals Court & ...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#50
The president picked his nominees. As we expect a president to do. Sen. Leahy has the power to stop
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#55
My comment/explanation was in regarding to DISTRICT COURT judges in 'red' states
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#56
In order to have more Democratic 'District Court' judges there needs to be a Dem U.S Senator...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#62
I'm utterly speechless and feel America has been kicked in the groin considering seven times
indepat
Jan 2014
#7
He isnt evil, that's absurd. He just has a propensity to appoint Republicans. Who knew? nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#36
Republican states get GOP District Court judges, nothing new here. See Comment #47
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#51
I didn't even know that a president could just abdicate the duty of choosing judges
Doctor_J
Jan 2014
#22
He also nominated Souter to the Supreme Court, maybe things aren't exactly the same.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#33
Do be sure to inform Rep. John Lewis that his outrage is 'faux,' won't you? n/t
markpkessinger
Jan 2014
#63
Not at all. You and a great many others, myself included, foolishly believed what he said.
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2014
#39
It's the two U.S. Senators from each state that sends the President a list of names to pick from...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#47
Btw, there currently are NO pending District Court nominees. Senate sent ALL back to WH on Dec 20th
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#59
Was the reaction "Nonsense, I can't believe that!" or was it "Crap, not again!"
Demo_Chris
Jan 2014
#75
"This time, I'm sure Republicans will *finally* realize that I'm a man they can do business with..."
MannyGoldstein
Jan 2014
#79