Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats finally broke the filibuster on judicial nominees, and what does this President do? . . . [View all]markpkessinger
(8,913 posts)21. Yes, George H.W. Bush nominated Sotomayor to the district court . . .
. . . Show me where, however, he, or any other Republican, allowed liberal Democrats to pick THREE OF FOUR vacancies ON A SINGLE FEDERAL TRIAL COURT, and then I might buy your assertion of equivalency.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Democrats finally broke the filibuster on judicial nominees, and what does this President do? . . . [View all]
markpkessinger
Jan 2014
OP
Google blue slip process. It's still a part of how the senate does business. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#17
So what you're saying is we may as well vote for Republicans? If appointing Republicans is the 'way
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#40
Seems like some folks do not understand how the process of nominating 'District Court' nominees...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#57
As I posted in another thread someone started trying to trash Obama for this>>>
KittyWampus
Jan 2014
#3
It is at the 'Senate Judiciary Committee' level of the process when some Senators refuse to ...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#64
he is completely entitled to voice his displeasure. It's understandable. Doesn't change reality.
KittyWampus
Jan 2014
#58
So it's pointless to elect Democrats then? I remember the urging to 'vote even for Blue Dogs
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#42
See Comment #47 re 'District Court' nominees - they're picked differently than Appeals Court & ...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#50
The president picked his nominees. As we expect a president to do. Sen. Leahy has the power to stop
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#55
My comment/explanation was in regarding to DISTRICT COURT judges in 'red' states
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#56
In order to have more Democratic 'District Court' judges there needs to be a Dem U.S Senator...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#62
I'm utterly speechless and feel America has been kicked in the groin considering seven times
indepat
Jan 2014
#7
He isnt evil, that's absurd. He just has a propensity to appoint Republicans. Who knew? nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#36
Republican states get GOP District Court judges, nothing new here. See Comment #47
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#51
I didn't even know that a president could just abdicate the duty of choosing judges
Doctor_J
Jan 2014
#22
He also nominated Souter to the Supreme Court, maybe things aren't exactly the same.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2014
#33
Do be sure to inform Rep. John Lewis that his outrage is 'faux,' won't you? n/t
markpkessinger
Jan 2014
#63
Not at all. You and a great many others, myself included, foolishly believed what he said.
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2014
#39
It's the two U.S. Senators from each state that sends the President a list of names to pick from...
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#47
Btw, there currently are NO pending District Court nominees. Senate sent ALL back to WH on Dec 20th
Tx4obama
Jan 2014
#59
Was the reaction "Nonsense, I can't believe that!" or was it "Crap, not again!"
Demo_Chris
Jan 2014
#75
"This time, I'm sure Republicans will *finally* realize that I'm a man they can do business with..."
MannyGoldstein
Jan 2014
#79