Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Weed is woo too [View all]

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
30. I was responding to YOUR commentary
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 09:56 AM
Jan 2014

"So even the Feds don't think it's "woo" unless they are coughing up one of their canned statements as they raid the latest dispensary"

To put it more bluntly: All of the words in the patent are written by the inventor (or its agent) - not the government - all the government cares about is whether the invention is new.

You could link to a million patents issued by the government - and it still wouldn't support your commentary that "the Feds don't think it is "woo" - because when the government grants a patent it doesn't ask, or care, if the invention being patented is safe and effective - or even that it works.

Here - go search for homeopathy (or anything else you categorize as woo) - you'll almost certainly find a bunch. There are, for example, 117 patents on homeopathic remedies.

ETA: Since I now see the first patent you cited has been assigned to the US government - Even having an employee of the US govt invent something isn't evidence that it believes anything other than that they were the first to invent it. I've written patent applications as outside counsel to a government agency. All it means is that the inventor thought it was new & the agency decided it was work a few thousand dollars to pay someone to draft a patent application. The inventor (employee) likely provided the bare bones information to the patent attorney who filled in the rest. Although the work I did no govt. patents wasn't in the medical field - there were no working models for the invention (there aren't required to be any). It was all theory.

Weed is woo too [View all] Lancero Jan 2014 OP
No, weed is wow. TeeYiYi Jan 2014 #1
People say the same of woo too. Lancero Jan 2014 #4
you had to go Niceguy1 Jan 2014 #2
It's perhaps "woo" as a medical treatment, perhaps, but it has another use. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #3
But it was tested on animals! icymist Jan 2014 #5
You're absolutely wrong. I've thoroughly tested it myself for decades. lob1 Jan 2014 #6
Same for any woo user :) Lancero Jan 2014 #7
for the 8,543 time the FEDS have patented the use solarhydrocan Jan 2014 #8
Yes and no... Lancero Jan 2014 #9
You seriously misunderstand patents. Ms. Toad Jan 2014 #21
Tell Kannalife, and the US Gov that granted them part of the patent solarhydrocan Jan 2014 #23
I was responding to YOUR commentary Ms. Toad Jan 2014 #30
19,419 studies listed on PubMed for "marijuana." Comrade Grumpy Jan 2014 #10
yeah, OP fail. dionysus Jan 2014 #12
Lets have a look at the first 5 shall we? Lancero Jan 2014 #16
How about the next 15,000? Comrade Grumpy Jan 2014 #24
I just pulled that definition from another topic... Lancero Jan 2014 #25
Medical Studies Involving Cannabis and Cannabis Extracts (1990-2012) Shampoobra Jan 2014 #27
more like dionysus Jan 2014 #11
Jerrrrrrrrrrrrrrry! zappaman Jan 2014 #17
No. progressoid Jan 2014 #13
Thank you. You made up my mind for me. blogslut Jan 2014 #14
Nope. Woo is what HAS been tested, and found wanting tkmorris Jan 2014 #15
finally KatyMan Jan 2014 #18
And politics, too. LanternWaste Jan 2014 #33
Woo is a weed cvoogt Jan 2014 #19
Woo Woo (Wait a minute, that one sounds good!) icymist Jan 2014 #20
Sounds yummy. In_The_Wind Jan 2014 #34
Not. I am pretty sure smokers have empirical evidence on its effects. on point Jan 2014 #22
Could the same be said for other treatments that we are calling woo? Lancero Jan 2014 #26
Cannabis medicine is sound science RainDog Jan 2014 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2014 #29
Did you really think there had been no scientific study of cannabis? DefenseLawyer Jan 2014 #31
When I was a young man, cannabis as medicine was called quackery Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #32
Much of what people say about weed is woo. NCTraveler Jan 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Weed is woo too»Reply #30