Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Good News! New bullet expands itself into four connected parts to kill better [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)54. Perhaps you were not aware of this but the reason the military does not use hollow point bullets ...
is not only the Hague Convention of 1899 but also the theory that it's better to wound an enemy than kill him as it will take one or more of your opponents to remove him from the field to a field hospital and that would also remove them from the fight. It can also be argued that a non expanding round could pass right through one enemy and still wound another.
OUr military snipers use "expanding point" ammo in certain cases.
Military Open-tip Ammunition
***snip***
This practice began to change subsequent to a 23 September 1985 opinion issued by the Judge Advocate General2, authored3 by W. Hays Parks4, Chief of the JAG's International Law Branch, for the signature of Major General Hugh R. Overholt, which stated:
" expanding point ammunition is legally permissible in counterterrorist operations not involving the engagement of the armed forces of another State."
On 12 October 1990, another Memorandum of Law from Parks at the request of the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) and coordinated with the Department of State, Army General Counsel, as well as the Offices of the Judge Advocates General of the Navy and Air Force, concluded that:
"The purpose of the 7.62mm "open-tip" MatchKing bullet is to provide maximum accuracy at very long range. Bullet fragmentation is not a design characteristic, however, nor a purpose for use of the MatchKing by United States Army snipers. Wounds caused by MatchKing ammunition are similar to those caused by a fully jacketed military ball bullet, which is legal under the law of war, when compared at the same ranges and under the same conditions. (The Sierra #2200 BTHP) not only meets, but exceeds, the law of war obligations of the United States for use in combat."
http://www.thegunzone.com/hague.html
I don't find the fact that you have a carry permit and rarely carry all that unusual. When I first got a concealed weapons permit twenty years ago, I tried to carry a full sized 1911 Colt .45 atuo pistol. That proved to be a real pain in the ass and it normally stayed home when I was out and about.
At the time, I lived in a somewhat dangerous neighborhood in the Tampa Bay Area. There was a drive by shooting two houses down from mine and it wasn't unusual to see police with drawn weapons chase people down my street or within walking distance of my home. I was working the graveyard shift and there was a rash of bump and rob incidents on the streets near my home where a car bumps you at a stop light and when you get out you find yourself facing armed attackers. Several employees at stores and restaurants near my home were shot during robberies and killed even after they handed over the cash in their registers. (Obviously I could have moved but I owned my home and didn't want to take on another mortgage.)
"Shall issue" concealed carry was sweeping the nation at that time. Gun manufacturers responded to the market and started to manufacture lighter and more compact handguns that were primarily designed for concealed carry. Smith and Wesson decided to upgrade their .38 caliber snub nosed revolvers to be able to handle the more powerful .38+P round. I checked the new models out and chose a Model 642 Airweight revolver which was primarily designed for pocket carry. I finally had found an extremely light and compact handgun that I could quickly grab and slide it and its holster into my pants pocket on my way out the door. I started to carry on a regular basis.
Still a .38+P round fired from a snub nosed revolver is near the lower levels of what's acceptable for self defense. I don't necessarily want to kill an attacker who intends to put me in a hospital for an extended stay or six feet under but simply to have a fair chance of stopping his attack. In order to be able to do so, I wish to have the best ammo available in my weapon. Round nosed bullets which do not expand are not well suited for this task and also have the potential to over penetrate and pass through an attackers body and injure someone behind. Therefore I prefer to load my weapon with a quality hollow point round that is designed to be effective in a snub nosed revolver.
Since I practice "situational awareness" and have moved to a more peaceful town in Florida after retiring, I seriously doubt and pray that I will never have to use my legally concealed weapon in self defense. I enjoy target shooting handguns but the last thing in the world I ever hope to have to do is to shoot another person.
Another question:
While you state that you rarely carry a concealed weapon, what type of ammo do you load in it when you do?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Good News! New bullet expands itself into four connected parts to kill better [View all]
onehandle
Jan 2014
OP
Not really, a bullet MUST penetrate sufficiently to kill. This is a gimmick. nt
Adrahil
Jan 2014
#24
Wait, you deride hollow point, but go with #00 buck? nine 33 caliber bullets at 1,200fps?!?
X_Digger
Jan 2014
#67
Out of curiosity, do you believe that hollow point bullets should be banned? (n/t)
spin
Jan 2014
#33
Perhaps you were not aware of this but the reason the military does not use hollow point bullets ...
spin
Jan 2014
#54
In military combat, yes. For civilian self defense against a criminal not so much. (n/t)
spin
Jan 2014
#59
At close range and in skilled hands a sword is far more lethal then a handgun. (n/t)
spin
Jan 2014
#35
Seems to me the spin would almost stop as soon as the pieces spread.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2014
#65
Smaller bullets will disable, not kill an enemy resulting in two solders helping him
egold2604
Jan 2014
#57